ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Self-tuning wireless network power management
Full text PdfPdf (421 KB)
Source International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Wireless LAN optimizations table of contents
Pages: 176 - 189  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-753-2
Authors
Manish Anand  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Edmund B. Nightingale  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Jason Flinn  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 75,   Citation Count: 33
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/938985.939004
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Current wireless network power management often substantially degrades performance and may even increase overall energy usage when used with latency-sensitive applications. We propose self-tuning power management (STPM) that adapts its behavior to the access patterns and intent of applications, the characteristics of the network interface, and the energy usage of the platform. We have implemented STPM as a Linux kernel module---our results show substantial benefits for distributed file systems, streaming audio, and thin-client applications. Compared to default 802.11b power management, STPM reduces the total energy usage of an iPAQ running the Coda distributed file system by 21% while also reducing interactive file system delay by 80%. Further, STPM adapts to diverse operating conditions: it yields good results on both laptops and handhelds, supports 802.11b network interfaces with substantially different characteristics, and performs well across a range of application network access patterns.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Box, D., Ehnebuske, D., Kakivaya, G., Layman, A., Mendelsohn, N., Nielsen, H. F., Thatte, S., and Winer, D. Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1. Tech. rep., W3C Note, May 2000.
 
2
Chandra, S. Wireless network interface energy consumption implications of popular streaming formats. In Proceedings of Multimedia Computing and Networking\/ (San Jose, CA, 2002), pp. 85--99.
 
3
Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco Aironet wireless LAN client adapters installation and configuration guide for Linux.
 
4
5
6
 
7
8
 
9
IEEE Local and Metropolitan Area Network Standards Committee. Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. New York, New York, 1997. IEEE Std 802.11-1997.
10
11
 
12
13
 
14
15
16
 
17
Network Working Group. NFS: Network File System protocol specification, March 1989. RFC 1094.
 
18
19
20
21
 
22
Stemm, M., and Katz, R. H. Measuring and reducing energy consumption of network interfaces in hand-held devices. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications, and Computer Science 80, 8 (August 1997), 1125--1131.
 
23
Sun Microsystems, Inc. Java Remote Method Invocation specification, December 1999.
24
25

CITED BY  33

Collaborative Colleagues:
Manish Anand: colleagues
Edmund B. Nightingale: colleagues
Jason Flinn: colleagues