ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Range-free localization schemes for large scale sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (278 KB)
Source International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Location information table of contents
Pages: 81 - 95  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-753-2
Authors
Tian He  University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Chengdu Huang  University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Brian M. Blum  University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
John A. Stankovic  University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Tarek Abdelzaher  University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 82,   Downloads (12 Months): 657,   Citation Count: 135
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/938985.938995
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Wireless Sensor Networks have been proposed for a multitude of location-dependent applications. For such systems, the cost and limitations of the hardware on sensing nodes prevent the use of range-based localization schemes that depend on absolute point-to-point distance estimates. Because coarse accuracy is sufficient for most sensor network applications, solutions in range-free localization are being pursued as a cost-effective alternative to more expensive range-based approaches. In this paper, we present APIT, a novel localization algorithm that is range-free. We show that our APIT scheme performs best when an irregular radio pattern and random node placement are considered, and low communication overhead is desired. We compare our work via extensive simulation, with three state-of-the-art range-free localization schemes to identify the preferable system configurations of each. In addition, we study the effect of location error on routing and tracking performance. We show that routing performance and tracking accuracy are not significantly affected by localization error when the error is less than 0.4 times the communication radio radius.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan, RADAR: An In-Building RF-Based User Location and Tracking System, In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM '00, March 2000.
 
2
J. Beutel, Geolocation in a PicoRadio Environment, M.S. Thesis, ETH Zurich, Electronics Laboratory, Dec. 1999.
 
3
N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann and D. Estrin, GPS-less Low Cost Outdoor Localization for Very Small Devices, IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 7(5):28--34, October 2000.
 
4
N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann and D. Estrin, Density Adaptive Algorithms for Beacon Placement in Wireless Sensor Networks, In IEEE ICDCS '01, Phoenix, AZ, April 2001.
5
 
6
J. Caffery, Jr. A New Approach to the Geometry of TOA Location, In IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), Boston, Mass, September 2000.
 
7
 
8
L. Doherty, L. E. Ghaoui and K. S. J. Pister, Convex Position Estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks, In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM '01, Anchorage, AK, April 2001.
9
 
10
D. Ganesan, B. Krishnamachari, A. Woo, D. Culler, D. Estrin and S. Wicker, Complex Behavior at Scale: An Experimental Study of Low-Power Wireless Sensor Networks <http://lecs.cs.ucla.edu/Publications/papers/Deepak-Empirical.pdf>, Technical Report UCLA/CSD-TR 02-0013, 2002.
 
11
L. Girod and D. Estrin, Robust Range Estimation using Acoustic and Multimodal Sensing, In Proceedings of IROS '01, Maui, Hawaii, October 2001.
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
J. Hightower, G. Boriello and R. Want, SpotON: An indoor 3D Location Sensing Technology Based on RF Signal Strength, University of Washington CSE Report #2000-02-02, February 2000.
 
16
X. Hong, K. Xu, and M. Gerla, Scalable routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks, IEEE Network magazine, vol 16, No. 4, 2002.
17
 
18
L.Kleinrock and J.Slivester, Optimum transmission radii for packet radio networks or why six is a magic number, In proceedings of national Telecomm conference, Pages 4.3.1--4.3.5, 1978
19
20
 
21
MICA Sensor Board Information, http://www.xbow.com
 
22
R. Nagpal, Organizing a Global Coordinate System from Local Information on an Amorphous Computer, A.I. Memo 1666, MIT A.I. Laboratory, August 1999.
 
23
R. Nagpal, H. Shrobe, J. Bachrach, Organizing a Global Coordinate System from Local Information on an Ad Hoc Sensor Network, In the 2nd International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN '03), Palo Alto, April, 2003.
24
 
25
D. Nicolescu and B. Nath, Ad-Hoc Positioning Systems (APS), In Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM '01, November 2001.
 
26
D. Niculescu and B. Nath, DV Based Positioning in Ad hoc Networks, In Journal of Telecommunication Systems, 2003.
 
27
D. Niculescu and B. Nath, Ad Hoc Positioning System (APS) using AoA, INFOCOM'03, San Francisco, CA,2003
28
 
29
30
31
32
 
33
B. H. Wellenhoff, H. Lichtenegger and J. Collins, Global Positions System: Theory and Practice, Fourth Edition. Springer Verlag, 1997.
34
35
36

CITED BY  135

Collaborative Colleagues:
Tian He: colleagues
Chengdu Huang: colleagues
Brian M. Blum: colleagues
John A. Stankovic: colleagues
Tarek Abdelzaher: colleagues