A comparison of mechanisms for improving mobile IP handoff latency for end-to-end TCP

ABSTRACT

Handoff latency results in packet losses and severe End-to-End TCP performance degradation as TCP, perceiving these losses as congestion, causes source throttling or retransmission. In order to mitigate these effects, various Mobile IP(v6) extensions have been designed to augment the base Mobile IP with hierarchical registration management, address pre-fetching and local retransmission mechanisms. While these methods have reduced the impact of losses on TCP goodput and improved handoff latency, no comparative studies have been done regarding the relative performance amongst them. In this paper, we comprehensively evaluated the impact of layer-3 handoff latency on End-to-End TCP for various Mobile IP(v6) extensions. Five such frameworks are compared with the base Mobile IPv6 framework, namely, i) Hierarchical Mobile IPv6, ii) Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 with Fast-handover, iii) (Flat) Mobile IPv6 with Fast-handover, iv) Simultaneous Bindings, and v) Seamless handoff architecture for Mobile IP (S-MIP). We propose an evaluation model examining the effect of linear and ping-pong movement on handoff latency and TCP goodput, for all above frameworks. Our results show that S-MIP performs best under both ping-pong and linear movements during a handoff, with latency comparable to a layer-2 (access layer) handoff. All other frameworks suffer from packet losses and performance degradation of some sort. We also proposed an optimization for S-MIP which improves the performance by further eliminating the possibility of packets out of order, caused by the local packet forwarding mechanisms of S-MIP.

REFERENCES

• 1: A. Bakre , B. R. Badrinath, I-TCP: indirect TCP for mobile hosts, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, p.136, May 30-June 02, 1995
• 2: Hari Balakrishnan , Srinivasan Seshan , Randy H. Katz, Improving reliable transport and handoff performance in cellular wireless networks, Wireless Networks, v.1 n.4, p.469-481, 1995 [doi>10.1007/BF01985757]
• 3: Marjory S. Blumenthal , David D. Clark, Rethinking the design of the Internet: the end-to-end arguments vs. the brave new world, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), v.1 n.1, p.70-109, Aug. 2001 [doi>10.1145/383034.383037]
• 4: Caceres, R., and Iftode, L. Improving the Performance of Reliable Transport Protocols in Mobile Computing Environments. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 13, No. 5, June 1995.
• 5: Ramón Cáceres , Venkata N. Padmanabhan, Fast and scalable handoffs for wireless internetworks, Proceedings of the 2nd annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.56-66, November 1996, Rye, New York, United States [doi>10.1145/236387.236405]
• 6: Campbell, A. T. et al. Comparison of IP Micro-Mobility Protocols. IEEE Wireless Communications Magazine, Vol. 9, No. 1, February 2002.
• 7: Hsieh, R., and Seneviratne, A. Performance analysis on Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 with Fast-handoff over End-to-End TCP. In Proceedings of GLOBECOM, Taipei, Taiwan 2002.
• 8: Hsieh, R., Zhou, Z.-G., and Seneviratne, A. S-MIP: A Seamless Handoff Architecture for Mobile IP. In Proceedings of INFOCOM, San Francisco, USA, 2003.
• 9: Koodli, R. (eds.). Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6. Internet Draft, IETF, September 2002. Work in Progress.
• 10: Malki, K. (eds.). Low Latency Handoffs in Mobile IPv4. Internet Draft, IETF, June 2002. Work in Progress.
• 11: Malki, K., and Soliman, H. Simultaneous Bindings for Mobile IPv6 Fast Handoffs. Internet Draft, IETF, June 2002. Work in Progress.
• 12: Monarch project. http://www.monarch.cs.rice.edu.
• 13: Perkins, C. IP Encapsulation within IP. RFC 2003, IETF, October 1996.
• 14: Perkins, C. IP Mobility support for IPv4. RFC 3344, IETF, August 2002.
• 15: Perkins, C., Johnson, D., and Arkko, J. Mobility Support in IPv6. Internet Draft, IETF, January 2003. Work in Progress.
• 16: R. Ramjee , T. La Porta , S. Thuel , K. Varadhan , S. Y. Wang, HAWAII: A Domain-Based Approach for Supporting Mobility in Wide-Area Wireless Networks, Proceedings of the Seventh Annual International Conference on Network Protocols, p.283, October 31-November 03, 1999
• 17: Soliman, H., Castelluccia, C., Malki, K., and Bellier, L. Hierarchical MIPv6 Mobility Management. Internet Draft, IETF, October, 2002. Work in Progress.
• 18: The UCB/LBNL/VINT Network Simulator - ns (version 2). http://www.isi.edu/nsnam.
• 19: Thomson, S., and Narten, T. IPv6 stateless address autoconfiguration. RFC 2462, IETF, December 1998.
• 20: Valko, A. et al. Design and Performance of Cellular Access Networks. IEEE Personal Communications, Special issue on IP-Based Mobile Telecommunications Networks, 2000.
• 21: Widmer, J. Extensions to the ns Network Simulator. http://www.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/~widmer.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.1 Network Architecture and Design
          Subjects: Wireless communication

Additional Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.4 PERFORMANCE OF SYSTEMS

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Performance