ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A survey of key management for secure group communication
Full text PdfPdf (346 KB)
Source ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) archive
Volume 35 ,  Issue 3  (September 2003) table of contents
Pages: 309 - 329  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISSN:0360-0300
Authors
Sandro Rafaeli  Computing Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
David Hutchison  Computing Department, Lancaster University, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 89,   Downloads (12 Months): 538,   Citation Count: 46
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/937503.937506
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Group communication can benefit from IP multicast to achieve scalable exchange of messages. However, there is a challenge of effectively controlling access to the transmitted data. IP multicast by itself does not provide any mechanisms for preventing nongroup members to have access to the group communication. Although encryption can be used to protect messages exchanged among group members, distributing the cryptographic keys becomes an issue. Researchers have proposed several different approaches to group key management. These approaches can be divided into three main classes: centralized group key management protocols, decentralized architectures and distributed key management protocols. The three classes are described here and an insight given to their features and goals. The area of group key management is then surveyed and proposed solutions are classified according to those characteristics.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ballardie, A. 1996. Scalable Multicast Key Distribution. RFC 1949.
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
Burmester, M. and Desmedt, Y. 1994. A secure and efficient conference key distribution system (extended abstract). In Advances in Cryptology---EUROCRYPT 94, A. D. Santis, Ed., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 950. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 275--286.
 
7
Canetti, R., Garay, J., Itkis, G., Micciancio, D., Naor, M., and Pinkas, B. 1999a. Multicast Security: A Taxonomy and Some Efficient Constructions. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM. Vol. 2. (New Yok, N.Y., Mar.). 708--716.
 
8
Canetti, R., Malkin, T., and Nissim, K. 1999b. Efficient communication-storage tradeoffs for multicast encryption. In Advances in Cryptology---EUROCRYPT '99, J. Stem, Ed. Lectures Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1599. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 459--474.
 
9
Chang, I., Engel, R., Kandlur, D., Pendarakis, D., and Saha, D. 1999. Key management for secure internet multicast using boolean function minimization techniques. In IEEE INFOCOM. Vol. 2. (New York, March 1999), 689--698.
 
10
DeCleene, B., Dondeti, L., Griffin, S., Hardjono, T., Kiwior, D., Kurose, J., Towsley, D., Vasudevan, S., and Zhang, C. 2001. Secure group communications for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the MILCOM. (June).
 
11
Deering, S. 1989. Host Extensions for IP Multicasting. RFC 1112.
 
12
Diffie, W. and Hellman, M. E. 1976. New directions in cryptography. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT-22, 6 (Nov.), 644--654.
 
13
Dondeti, L., Mukherjee, S., and Samal, A. 1999a. A distributed group key management scheme for secure many-to-many communication. Tech. Rep. PINTL-TR-207-99, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland.
 
14
Dondeti, L., Mukherjee, S., and Samal, A. 1999b. Scalable secure one-to-many group communication using dual encryption. Comput. Commun. 23, 17 (Nov.), 1681--1701.
 
15
Fenner, W. 1997. Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2. RFC 2236.
16
 
17
Hardjono, T. and Tsudik, G. 2000. IP multicast security: Issues and directions. Ann. Telecom. 324--340.
 
18
Harney, H. and Muckenhirn, C. 1997a. Group Key Management Protocol (GKMP) Specification. RFC 2093.
 
19
Harney, H. and Muckenhirn, C. 1997b. Group Key Management Protocol (GKMP) Architecture. RFC 2094.
20
 
21
Li, M., Poovendran, R., and Berenstein, C. 2001. Optimization of key storage for secure. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS). (John Hopkins, Mar.).
 
22
McDaniel, P., Prakash, A., and Honeyman, P. 1999. Antigone: A flexible framework for secure group communication. In Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Security Symposium. (Washington, D.C. Aug.). 99--114.
 
23
McGrew, D. A. and Sherman, A. T. 1998. Key establishment in large dynamic groups using one-way function trees. Tech. Rep. No. 0755 (May), TIS Labs at Network Associates, Inc., Glenwood, Md.
 
24
Meyer, D. 1998. Administratively Scoped IP Multicast. RFC 2365.
 
25
Mills, D. L. 1992. Network Time Protocol (Version 3) Specification, Implementation and Analysis. RFC 1305.
26
27
 
28
Moyer, M. J., Rao, J. R., and Rohatgi, P. 1999. A survey of security issues in multcast communications. IEEE Netw. Mag. 13, 6 (Nov./Dec.), 12--23.
 
29
Perrig, A. 1999. Efficient collaborative key management protocols for secure autonomous group communication. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Cryptographic Techniques and E-Commerce (CrypTEC'99). (Hong Kong, China, July). M. Blum and C H Lee, Eds. City University of Hong Kong Press, Hong Kong, China, pp. 192--202.
 
30
 
31
 
32
 
33
Rivest, R. 1992. The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm. RFC 1321.
 
34
Rodeh, O., Birman, K., and Dolev, D. 2000. Optimized group rekey for group communication systems. In Network and Distributed System Security. (San Diego, Calif., Feb.).
 
35
 
36
37
 
38
Waldvogel, M., Caronni, G., Sun, D., Weiler, N., and Plattner, B. 1999. The VersaKey framework: Versatile group key management. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. (Special Issue on Middleware) 17, 9 (Aug.), 1614--1631.
 
39
Wallner, D., Harder, E., and Agee, R. 1999. Key Management for Multicast: Issues and Architectures. RFC 2627.
 
40
 
41
 
42

CITED BY  47

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sandro Rafaeli: colleagues
David Hutchison: colleagues