ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Which semantic web?
Full text PdfPdf (330 KB)
Source Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia archive
Proceedings of the fourteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia table of contents
Nottingham, UK
SESSION: Hypermedia semantics table of contents
Pages: 57 - 66  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-704-4
Authors
Catherine C. Marshall  Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA
Frank M. Shipman  Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 73,   Downloads (12 Months): 541,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/900051.900063
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Through scenarios in the popular press and technical papers in the research literature, the promise of the Semantic Web has raised a number of different expectations. These expectations can be traced to three different perspectives on the Semantic Web. The Semantic Web is portrayed as: (1) a universal library, to be readily accessed and used by humans in a variety of information use contexts; (2) the backdrop for the work of computational agents completing sophisticated activities on behalf of their human counterparts; and (3) a method for federating particular knowledge bases and databases to perform anticipated tasks for humans and their agents. Each of these perspectives has both theoretical and pragmatic entailments, and a wealth of past experiences to guide and temper our expectations. In this paper, we examine all three perspectives from rhetorical, theoretical, and pragmatic viewpoints with an eye toward possible outcomes as Semantic Web efforts move forward.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Berners-Lee, T. Semantic Web Road map. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html (last modified Oct. 14, 1998).
 
3
Berners-Lee, T. What the Semantic Web can represent. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDFnot.html (last modified Sept. 17, 1998).
 
4
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. The Semantic Web. Scientific American, May 17 2001, 34--43.
5
 
6
7
8
9
 
10
Fischer, G., and Reeves, B.N. Beyond Intelligent Interfaces: Exploring, Analyzing and Creating Success Models of Cooperative Problem Solving. Applied Intelligence, Special Issue Intelligent Interfaces 1, (1992), 311--332.
 
11
Furuta, R., Marshall, C.C. "Genre as Reflection of Technology in the World-Wide Web" in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Hypermedia Design (June 1-3) Montpellier, France, LIRMM 1995, 203--214.
 
12
Gibson, M. and Ruotolo, C. Beyond the Web: TEI and the Ebook Revolution. Proceedings of ACH'01. http://www.nyu.edu/its/humanities/ach_allc2001/papers/gibson/index.html.
 
13
Gilchrist, A. From Aristotle to the 'semantic web', Record of the Library Association, January 2002, http://www.la-hq.org.uk/directory/record/r200201/article2.html.
 
14
15
16
 
17
 
18
Hendler, J., Berners-Lee, T., and Miller, E. Integrating Applications on the Semantic Web, 2002, http://www.w3.org/2002/07/swint.
 
19
Hersh, W. Medical Informatics: Improving Health Care Through Information. Journal of the AMA, October 23/30, 2002, Vol. 288, No. 16. 1955--1958.
 
20
Introna, L. and Nissenbaum, H. Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters. The Information Society, 16(3), 2000, 1--17.
21
22
 
23
Levy, D.M. Scrolling Forward: Making Sense of Documents in the Digital Age. New York: Arcade Publishing, 2001.
24
25
 
26
 
27
28
 
29
 
30
Minsky, M. A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In The Psychology of Computer Vision, P. Winston, Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975, 211--277.
31
 
32
Peper, G., MacIntyre, C., and Keenan, J. Hypertext: A New Approach for Implementing an Expert System. Proceedings of ITL Expert Systems Conference, 1989.
 
33
Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966.
 
34
Rosch, E. Principles of categorization. in: Rosch, E.; Lloyd, B. B. (eds.), Cognition and Categorization. New Jersey: Hillsdale, 1978.
 
35
 
36
 
37
 
38
Shum, S.B., Motta, E. and Domingue, J. ScholOnto: An Ontology-Based Digital Library Server for Research Documents and Discourse. International Journal on Digital Libraries (2000), 3 (3), 237--248.
 
39
Simon, H. The Shape of Automation for Men and Management, New York: Harper & Row, 1965.
 
40
Star, S.L. and Ruhleder, K. 1996. "Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large-scale collaborative systems," Information Systems Research, 7, 111--138.
 
41

CITED BY  14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Catherine C. Marshall: colleagues
Frank M. Shipman: colleagues