ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A symbolic representation of time series, with implications for streaming algorithms
Full text PdfPdf (456 KB)
Source Data Mining And Knowledge Discovery archive
Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGMOD workshop on Research issues in data mining and knowledge discovery table of contents
San Diego, California
SESSION: Data streams I table of contents
Pages: 2 - 11  
Year of Publication: 2003
Authors
Jessica Lin  University of California - Riverside, Riverside, CA
Eamonn Keogh  University of California - Riverside, Riverside, CA
Stefano Lonardi  University of California - Riverside, Riverside, CA
Bill Chiu  University of California - Riverside, Riverside, CA
Sponsor
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 202,   Citation Count: 50
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/882082.882086
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The parallel explosions of interest in streaming data, and data mining of time series have had surprisingly little intersection. This is in spite of the fact that time series data are typically streaming data. The main reason for this apparent paradox is the fact that the vast majority of work on streaming data explicitly assumes that the data is discrete, whereas the vast majority of time series data is real valued.Many researchers have also considered transforming real valued time series into symbolic representations, nothing that such representations would potentially allow researchers to avail of the wealth of data structures and algorithms from the text processing and bioinformatics communities, in addition to allowing formerly "batch-only" problems to be tackled by the streaming community. While many symbolic representations of time series have been introduced over the past decades, they all suffer from three fatal flaws. Firstly, the dimensionality of the symbolic representation is the same as the original data, and virtually all data mining algorithms scale poorly with dimensionality. Secondly, although distance measures can be defined on the symbolic approaches, these distance measures have little correlation with distance measures defined on the original time series. Finally, most of these symbolic approaches require one to have access to all the data, before creating the symbolic representation. This last feature explicitly thwarts efforts to use the representations with streaming algorithms.In this work we introduce a new symbolic representation of time series. Our representation is unique in that it allows dimensionality/numerosity reduction, and it also allows distance measures to be defined on the symbolic approach that lower bound corresponding distance measures defined on the original series. As we shall demonstrate, this latter feature is particularly exciting because it allows one to run certain data mining algorithms on the efficiently manipulated symbolic representation, while producing identical results to the algorithms that operate on the original data. Finally, our representation allows the real valued data to be converted in a streaming fashion, with only an infinitesimal time and space overhead.We will demonstrate the utility of our representation on the classic data mining tasks of clustering, classification, query by content and anomaly detection.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
4
 
5
Bastogne, T., Noura, H., Richard A. amp; Hittinger, J. M. (2002). Application of Subspace Methods to the Identification of a Winding Process. In proceedings of the 4th European Control Conference, Vol. 5, Brussels.
 
6
Berndt, D. amp; Clifford, J. (1994) Using Dynamic Time Warping to Find Patterns in Time Series. In proceedings of the Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, at the 12th Int'l Conference on Artificial Intelligence. July 31-Aug 4, Seattle, WA. pp 229--248.
 
7
8
 
9
Dasgupta, D. amp; Forrest, S. (1996) Novelty Detection in Time Series Data using Ideas from Immunology. In proceedings of The International Conference on Intelligent Systems. June 19--21.
 
10
 
11
Daw, C. S., Finney, C. E. A. amp; Tracy, E. R. (2001). Symbolic Analysis of Experimental Data. Review of Scientific Instruments. (2002-07-22).
 
12
 
13
Durbin, R., Eddy, S., Krogh, A. amp; Mitchison, G. (1998). Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press.
14
 
15
Fayyad, U., Reina, C. &. Bradley, P. (1998). Initialization of Iterative Refinement Clustering Algorithms. In proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY, Aug 27--31. pp 194--198.
 
16
17
 
18
19
20
 
21
22
23
24
 
25
Keogh, E. amp; Pazzani, M. (1998). An Enhanced Representation of Time Series Which Allows Fast and Accurate Classification, Clustering and Relevance Feedback. In proceedings of the 4th Int'l Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, NY, Aug 27--31. pp 239--241.
 
26
Lin, J., Keogh, E., Lonardi, S. amp; Patel, P. (2002). Finding Motifs in Time Series. In proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Temporal Data Mining, at the 8th ACM SIGKDD Int'l Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, July 23--26. pp. 53--68.
 
27
Larsen, R. J. amp; Marx, M. L. (1986). An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and Its Applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, N.J. 2nd Edition.
 
28
 
29
Reinert, G., Schbath, S. amp; Waterman, M. S. (2000). Probabilistic and Statistical Properties of Words: An Overview. Journal of Computational. Biology. Vol. 7, pp 1--46.
 
30
 
31
 
32
Staden, R. (1989). Methods for Discovering Novel Motifs in Nucleic Acid Sequences. Computer Applications in Biosciences. Vol. 5(5). pp 293--298.
33
 
34
 
35

CITED BY  50

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jessica Lin: colleagues
Eamonn Keogh: colleagues
Stefano Lonardi: colleagues
Bill Chiu: colleagues