ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Planning and information foraging theories: social implications and extensions
Full text PdfPdf (480 KB)
Source ACM Journal of Computer Documentation (JCD) archive
Volume 26 ,  Issue 4  (November 2002) table of contents
DEPARTMENT: Commentaries table of contents
Pages: 176 - 180  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISSN:1527-6805
Author
Jordynn Jack  Pennsylvania State University
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 182,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/882061.882065
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Information foraging theory and strategic planning theory can help technical communicators think about effective research methods. A broader understanding of social theory can complement Gattis's approach by adding considerations related to underlying ideological assumptions and to how research practices are situated in the larger contexts of organizations, communities, and cultures.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Coletta, W. J. (1992). The ideologically biased use of language in scientific and technical writing. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1(1), 59--70.
 
2
Hovde, M. R. (2001). Research tactics for constructing perceptions of subject matter in organizational contexts: An ethnographic study of technical communicators. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10, 59--95.
 
3
 
4
Longo, B. (2000). Spurious coin: A history of science, management, and technical writing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
 
5
Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40, 610--617.
 
6
Slack, J. D., Miller, D. J., Doak, J. (1993). The technical communicator as author: Meaning, power, authority. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7(1), 12--36.
 
7
Winsor, D. A. (1990). Engineering writing/writing engineering. College Composition and Communication, 41, 58--70.