ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Simple and fast optimistic protocols for fair electronic exchange
Full text PdfPdf (753 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing archive
Proceedings of the twenty-second annual symposium on Principles of distributed computing table of contents
Boston, Massachusetts
Pages: 12 - 19  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-708-7
Author
Silvio Micali  MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 64,   Citation Count: 13
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/872035.872038
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Assume each of two parties has something the other wants. Then, a fair exchange is an electronic protocol guaranteeing that either both parties get what they want, or none of them does. Protocols relying on traditional trusted parties easily guarantee such exchanges, but are inefficient (because a trusted party must be part of every execution) and expensive (because trusted parties want to be paid for each execution).In this paper we• Quickly review fair exchanges that are optimistic, that is, relying on a trusted party that (1) does not participate at all in an honest execution, and yet (2) guarantees the fairness of all executions; and• Present some older and surprisingly simple optimistic protocols for fair certified e-mail and contract signing that never appeared in the scientific literature.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Asokan, N., Shoup, V., and Waidner, M. Optimistic Fair Exchange of Digital Signatures. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communication, vol. 18, pp. 591--610, April 2000.
3
 
4
 
5
Ban, F., Deng, R. H., and Mao, W. Efficient and Practical Fair Exchange Protocols. IEEE Symp. On Security and Privacy, pp. 77--85, 1998.
 
6
Ben-Or, M., Goldreich, O., Micali, S., and Rivest, R. A Fair Protocol for Signing Contracts. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 36/1 (1990) 40--46.
 
7
Blum, M. Three Applications of the Oblivious Transfer: Part I: Coin Flipping by the telephone; Part II: How to Exchange Secrets; Part III: How to Send Certified Electronic Mail. Manuscript. University of California, Berkeley, 1981. (Also described in Cryptographers gather to discuss Research. By G. Kolata. Science, Vol. 214, November 6, 1981.)
 
8
 
9
 
10
Dolev, D., Dwork, D., and Naor, N. Non-Malleable Cryptography. Proc. 33rd Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE, 1992.
11
 
12
 
13
Herzog, J., Liskov, M., and Micali, S. Plain-Text Awareness Via Key Registration. To appear, Proc. CRYPTO 2003.
 
14
Luby M., Micali, S., and Rackoff, C. How to simultaneously exchange a secret bit by flipping a symmetrically-biased coin. Proc. 24th ann. IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, November 1983, Arizona, pp. 11--22
 
15
Micali, S. Simultaneous Electronic Transactions. U.S. Patent No. 5,666,420, continuation of application No. 408,551, filed March 21, 1995, issued September 9, 1997. (Also presented at the 1997 RSA Data Security Conference, San Francisco, January 1997--Not included in the printed version of the proceedings.)
 
16
Micali, S. Ideal Electronic Negotiations. U.S. Patent No. 5,615,269, filed February 22, 1996, issued March 25, 1997.
 
17
Pfitzmann, B., Schunter, M., and Waidner, M. Provably Secure Certified Mail. Tech Report RZ 3207 (93253), IBM Research Division, Zurich, Switzerland, February 2000.
 
18
Rabin, M. Transaction Protection by Beacons. Harvard Tech. Report 29--81, 1981. Subsequent version: JCSS 27(2) 1983.

CITED BY  13