ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Optimal body bias selection for leakage improvement and process compensation over different technology generations
Full text PdfPdf (101 KB)
Source International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design archive
Proceedings of the 2003 international symposium on Low power electronics and design table of contents
Seoul, Korea
SESSION: Design strategies for controlling standby leakage table of contents
Pages: 116 - 121  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-682-X
Authors
Cassondra Neau  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Kaushik Roy  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 88,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/871506.871537
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present techniques to determine the optimal body bias (forward or reverse) to minimize leakage current and compensate process variations in scaled CMOS technologies. A circuit trades off sub-threshold leakage with band-to-band tunneling leakage at the source/drain junctions to determine the optimal substrate bias for different technology generations and under process variations. Using optimal body bias results in 43% and 42% savings in leakage for predictive 70nm and 50nm NMOS devices, respectively. This technique also reduces the effects of die-to-die and intra-die process variations in transistor length and supply voltage by 43% and 60%, respectively, in 50nm NMOS devices, resulting in improved yield.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
T. Kuroda, et. al., "A 0.9-V, 150-MHz, 10-mW, 4 mm2, 2-D Discrete Cosine Transform Processor with Variable Threshold-Voltage (VT) Scheme," IEEE JSSC, vol. 31, No. 11, Nov. 1996, pp. 1770--1779.
 
2
S-F. Huang, et al., "Scalability and Biasing Strategy for CMOS with Active Well Bias," 2001 Symp. on VLSI Tech. Digest of Technical Papers. pp. 107--108.
 
3
A. Keshavarzi , et al., "Effectiveness of Reverse Body Bias for Low Power CMOS Circuits," Proc. of 8th NASA Symposium on VLSI Design, 1999, pp. 2.3.1--2.3.9.
 
4
A. Keshavarzi, et al., "Forward Body Bias for Microprocessors in 130nm Technology Generation and Beyond," 2002 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers. pp. 312--315.
 
5
J. Tschanz, et. al., "Adaptive Body Bias for Reducing Impacs of Die-to-Die and Within-Die Parameter Variations on Microprocessor Frequency and Leakage," 2002 ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, pp 477--479.
 
6
V. De, et. al., "Techniques for Leakage Power Reduction,"Design of High-Performance Microprocessor Circuits, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2001, pp. 48--52.
 
7
 
8
K. Schuegraf and C. Hu, "Hole Injection SiO2 Breakdown Model for Very Low Voltage Lifetime Extrapolation," IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, vol.41, May 1994, pp. 761--767.
 
9
Berkeley Predictive Technology Model, U.C. Berkeley, http://www-devices.eecs.berkeley.edu/ ptm/
 
10
BSIM4. BSIM Group, U.C. Berkeley, http://www-devices.eecs.berkeley.edu/bsim3/bsim4.html
 
11
Taurus-Device Simulator. Synopsys, 2002.
12
 
13
"Well-Tempered" Bulk-Si NMOS Device Home Page, Microsystems Technology Laboratory, MIT, http://www-mtl.mit.edu/Well/
 
14
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors 2001 Edition, Semiconductor Industry Association, http://public.itrs.net

CITED BY  14

Collaborative Colleagues:
Cassondra Neau: colleagues
Kaushik Roy: colleagues