ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An asynchronous complete method for distributed constraint optimization
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the second international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Melbourne, Australia
SESSION: Distributed constraint satisfaction/optimization table of contents
Pages: 161 - 168  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-683-8
Authors
Pragnesh Jay Modi  University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA
Wei-Min Shen  University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA
Milind Tambe  University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA
Makoto Yokoo  NTT Communication Science Labs, Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Soraku-gun, Kyoto, Japan
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 38
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/860575.860602
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a new polynomial-space algorithm, called Adopt, for distributed constraint optimization (DCOP). DCOP is able to model a large class of collaboration problems in multi agent systems where a solution within given quality parameters must be found. Existing methods for DCOP are not able to provide theoretical guarantees on global solution quality while operating both efficiently and asynchronously. Adopt is guaranteed to find an optimal solution, or a solution within a user-specified distance from the optimal, while allowing agents to execute asynchronously and in parallel. Adopt obtains these properties via a distributed search algorithm with several novel characteristics including the ability for each agent to make local decisions based on currently available information and without necessarily having global certainty. Theoretical analysis shows that Adopt provides provable quality guarantees, while experimental results show that Adopt is significantly more efficient than synchronous methods. The speedups are shown to be partly due to the novel search strategy employed and partly due to the asynchrony of the algorithm.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Y. Hamadi, C. Bessiere, and J. Quinqueton. Backtracking in distributed constraint networks. In European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1998.
 
2
K. Hirayama and M. Yokoo. Distributed partial constraint satisfaction problem. In G. Smolka, editor, Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, pages 222--236. 1997.
 
3
 
4
 
5
J. Liu and K. Sycara. Exploiting problem structure for distributed constraint optimization. In Proceedings of International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, 1995.
 
6
 
7
P. Mesequer and M. A. Jiménez. Distributed forward checking. In Proceedings of CP-00 Workshop on Distributed Constraint Satisfaction, 2000.
 
8
 
9
T. Schiex, H. Fargier, and G. Verfaillie. Valued constraint satisfaction problems: Hard and easy problems. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995.
 
10
W.-M. Shen, B. Salemi, and P. Will. Hormone-inspired adaptive communication and distributed control for conro self-reconfigurable robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2002.
 
11
 
12
M. Tambe. Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 7:83--124, 1997.
 
13
 
14

CITED BY  40

Collaborative Colleagues:
Pragnesh Jay Modi: colleagues
Wei-Min Shen: colleagues
Milind Tambe: colleagues
Makoto Yokoo: colleagues