ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Quantitative evaluation of passage retrieval algorithms for question answering
Full text PdfPdf (160 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval table of contents
Toronto, Canada
SESSION: Qusetion answering table of contents
Pages: 41 - 47  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-646-3
Authors
Stefanie Tellex  MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA
Boris Katz  MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA
Jimmy Lin  MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA
Aaron Fernandes  MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA
Gregory Marton  MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Cambridge, MA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 114,   Citation Count: 30
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/860435.860445
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Passage retrieval is an important component common to many question answering systems. Because most evaluations of question answering systems focus on end-to-end performance, comparison of common components becomes difficult. To address this shortcoming, we present a quantitative evaluation of various passage retrieval algorithms for question answering, implemented in a framework called Pauchok. We present three important findings: Boolean querying schemes perform well in the question answering task. The performance differences between various passage retrieval algorithms vary with the choice of document retriever, which suggests significant interactions between document retrieval and passage retrieval. The best algorithms in our evaluation employ density-based measures for scoring query terms. Our results reveal future directions for passage retrieval and question answering.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
C. Clarke, G. Cormack, D. Kisman, and T. Lynam. Question answering by passage selection (Multitext experiments for TREC-9). In Proceedings of the Ninth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-9)2000.
 
3
 
4
 
5
S. Harabagiu, D. Moldovan, M. Pasca, M. Surdeanu, R. Mihalcea, R. Girju, V. Rus, F. Lacatusu, P. Morarescu, and R. Bunescu. Answering complex, list, and context questions with LCC's Question-Answering Server. In Proceedings of the Tenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2001)2001.
 
6
 
7
 
8
E. Hovy, U. Hermjakob, and C.-Y. Lin. The use of external knowledge in factoid QA. In Proceedings of the Tenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2001) 2001.
 
9
A. Ittycheriah, M. Franz, and S. Roukos. IBM's statistical question answering system-TREC-10.In Proceedings of the Tenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2001)2001.
 
10
A. Ittycheriah, M. Franz, W.-J. Zhu, and A. Ratnaparkhi. IBM's statistical question answering system. In Proceedings of the 9th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-9)2000.
 
11
B. Katz and J. Lin. Selectively using relations to improve precision in question answering. In Proceedings of the EACL-2003 Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Question Answering 2003.
 
12
G. G. Lee, J. Seo, S. Lee, H. Jung, B.-H. Cho, C. Lee, B.-K. Kwak, J. Cha, D. Kim, J. An, H. Kim, and K. Kim. SiteQ: Engineering high performance QA system using lexico-semantic pattern matching and shallow NLP. In Proceedings of the Tenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2001)2001.
 
13
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, M. Gatford, and A. Payne. Okapi at TREC-4. In Proceedings of the 4th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-4)1995.
 
18
S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. Hancock-Beaulieu, and M. Gatford. Okapi at TREC-3. In Proceedings of the 3rd Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-3)1994.
19
 
20
M. M. Soubbotin and S. M. Soubbotin. Patterns of potential answer expressions as clues to the right answers. In Proceedings of the Tenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2001)2001.
 
21
R. Srihari and W. Li. Information extraction supported question answering. In Proceedings of the Eighth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-8)1999.
 
22
J. L. Vicedo and A. Ferrandez. University of Alicante at TREC-10. In Proceedings of the Tenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2001)2001.
 
23
E. M. Voorhees. Overview of the TREC 2001 question answering track. In Proceedings of the Tenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2001)2001.
 
24
E. M. Voorhees. Overview of the TREC 2002 question answering track. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2002)2002.
 
25
E. M. Voorhees and D. M. Tice. Overview of the TREC-9 question answering track. In Proceedings of the Ninth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-9)2000.

CITED BY  30

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stefanie Tellex: colleagues
Boris Katz: colleagues
Jimmy Lin: colleagues
Aaron Fernandes: colleagues
Gregory Marton: colleagues