Habitat monitoring: application driver for wireless communications technology

ABSTRACT

As new fabrication and integration technologies reduce the cost and size of micro-sensors and wireless interfaces, it becomes feasible to deploy densely distributed wireless networks of sensors and actuators. These systems promise to revolutionize biological, earth, and environmental monitoring applications, providing data at granularities unrealizable by other means. In addition to the challenges of miniaturization, new system architectures and new network algorithms must be developed to transform the vast quantity of raw sensor data into a manageable stream of high-level data. To address this, we propose a tiered system architecture in which data collected at numerous, inexpensive sensor nodes is filtered by local processing on its way through to larger, more capable and more expensive nodes.We briefly describe Habitat monitoring as our motivating application and introduce initial system building blocks designed to support this application. The remainder of the paper presents details of our experimental platform.

REFERENCES

• 1: {Abelson99} H. Abelson, D. Allen, D. Coore, C. Hanson, G. Homsy, T. Knight, R. Nagpal, E. Rauch, G. Sussman and R. Weiss, "Amorphous Computing", MIT AI Memo 1665, August 1999.
• 2: {Colwell98} Colwell, Rita, 1998. Testimony of Dr. Rita Colwell, Director, NSF, Before the Basic Research Subcommittee, House Science Committee, Hearing on Remote Sensing as a Research and Management Tool. 9/28/1998.http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/congress/rc80928.htm
• 3: Deborah Estrin , Ramesh Govindan , John Heidemann , Satish Kumar, Next century challenges: scalable coordination in sensor networks, Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.263-270, August 15-19, 1999, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/313451.313556]
• 4: {Gell-Mann95} Gell-Mann, Murray. 1995. What Is Complexity? Complexity, Vol. 1, no. 1 John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
• 5: {Hamilton00} Hamilton, Michael P. 2000. Hummercams, Robots, and the Virtual Reserve. Directors Notebook, James San Jacinto Mountains Reserve web site. February 6, 2000. http://www.jamesreserve.edu/news.html
• 6: {Hamilton-Flaxman92} Hamilton, M. P. and M. Flaxman. 1992. Scientific data visualization and biological diversity: new tools for spatializing multimedia observations of species and ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning. 21:285--297.
• 7: Chalermek Intanagonwiwat , Ramesh Govindan , Deborah Estrin, Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks, Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.56-67, August 06-11, 2000, Boston, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/345910.345920]
• 8: {Keitt-etal97} Keitt, T. H., D. L. Urban, and B. T. Milne. 1997. Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Ecology {online}1(1): 4. Available from the Internet. http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art4
• 9: {Lohr-etal95} Lohr, S. A., P. G. Connors, J. A. Stanford and J. S. Clegg. 1995. A New Horizon for Biological Field Stations and Marine Laboratories. Miscellaneous Publication 3, Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO, 36 pp.
• 10: {Mataric95} Maja J. Mataric, "Issues and Approaches in the Design of Collective Autonomous Agents", Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 16(2--4), Dec 1995, pp. 321--331
• 11: {Michener-etal98} Michener, W.K., J,H. Porter and S.G. Stafford. 1998. Data and Information Management in the Ecological Sciences: A Resource Guide. LTER Network Office, Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque 138 pp. (DIMES report) http://www.lternet.edu/ecoinformatics/guide/frame.htm
• 12: {Mills94} David L. Mills. Internet Time Synchronization: The Network Time Protocol. In Zhonghua Yang and T. Anthony Marsland, editors, Global States and Time in Distributed Systems. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994.
• 13: J. M. Kahn , R. H. Katz , K. S. J. Pister, Next century challenges: mobile networking for “Smart Dust”, Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.271-278, August 15-19, 1999, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/313451.313558]
• 14: G. J. Pottie , W. J. Kaiser, Wireless integrated network sensors, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.5, p.51-58, May 2000 [doi>10.1145/332833.332838]
• 15: {Sukhatme99} Gaurav S. Sukhatme, James F. Montgomery, and Maja J. Mataric, "Design and Implementation of a Mechanically Heterogeneous Robot Group", Proceedings of Mobile Robots XIV - SPIE 99, Boston, MA
• 16: Gaurav S. Sukhatme , Maja J. Mataric, Embedding robots into the Internet, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.5, p.67-73, May 2000 [doi>10.1145/332833.332841]
• 17: {Walker-Steffen97} Walker, B., and W. Steffen. 1997. An overview of the implications of global change for natural and managed terrestrial ecosystems. Conservation Ecology {online} 1(2) http://www.consecol.org/voll/iss2/art2
• 18: {RDD} Radiometrix device drivers, http://www.circlemud.org/jelson/software/radiometrix
• 19: {EML} Emlog Software Package, http://www.circlemud.org/jelson/software/emlog
• 20: {PAR} Parapin PC Pin Control Library http://www.circlemud.org/jelson/software/parapin
• 21: {RPC} Radio Packet Controller, http://www.radiometrix.com
• 22: {104} PC104 Consortium, http://www.pc104.org
• 23: {PAL} 3COM Palm Pilot Devices, http://www.palm.com
• 24: {TIN} TINI: Tiny InterNet Interface, Ibutton, http://www.ibutton.com/TINI/index.html
• 25: {UCS} Embedded Linux/Microcontroller Project, http://www.uclinux.com/
• 26: {CCL} CCLinux: The Minimal Linux Distribution, http://www.cosmicchaos.com/CClinux/index.shtml

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
applications, low-power wireless, sensor networks, testbeds