|
ABSTRACT
In this paper we demonstrate the benefits of application involvement in operating system power management. We present Coop-I/O, an approach to reduce the power consumption of devices while encompassing all levels of the system---from the hardware and OS to a new interface for cooperative I/O that can be used by energy-aware applications. We assume devices which can be set to low-power operation modes if they are not accessed and where switching between modes consumes additional energy, e.g. devices with rotating components or network devices consuming energy for the establishment and shutdown of network connections. In these cases frequent mode switches should be avoided.With Coop-I/O, applications can declare open, read and write operations as deferrable and even abortable by specifying a time-out and a cancel flag. This information enables the operating system to delay and batch requests so that the number of power mode switches is reduced and the device can be kept longer in a low-power mode. We have deployed our concept to the IDE hard disk driver and Ext2 file system of Linux and to typical real-life programs so that they make use of the new cooperative I/O functions. With energy savings of up to 50%, the experimental results demonstrate the benefits of the concept. We will show that Coop-I/O even outperforms the "oracle" shutdown policy which defines the lower bound in power consumption if the timing of requests can not be influenced.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
American National Standards Institute. Information Technology -- AT Attachment with Packet Interface 5 (ATA/ATAPI-5). Published as ANSI/INCITS 340-2000, Dec 2000
|
| |
2
|
M. Berger, S. Richter, ACPI4Linux. http://phobos.fs.tum.de/acpi/index.html
|
| |
3
|
Compaq, Intel, Microsoft, Phoenix, Toshiba. Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification 2.0a, Mar 2002
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
F. Douglis, P. Krishnan, B Marsh. Thwarting the Power Hungry Disk. In Proceedings of the 1994 Winter USENIX Conference, Jan 1994
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
IBM Corporation. Hard Disk Drive Specifications for Travelstar 48GH, 30GN & 15GN, Rev. 2.0, Jan 2002
|
| |
10
|
P. Krishnan, P. Long, J. Vitter. Adaptive Disk Spin-Down via Optimal Rent-to-Buy in Probabilistic Environments. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 332--330, July 1995
|
| |
11
|
Li-K; Kumpf-R; Horton-P; Anderson-T. A Quantitative Analysis of Disk Drive Power Management in Portable Computers. In Proceedings of the USENIX Winter 1994 Conference, pp. 279--292, Jan 1994
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Microsoft. OnNow Power Management http://www.microsoft.com/hwdev/onnow/
|
 |
17
|
Brian D. Noble , M. Satyanarayanan , Dushyanth Narayanan , James Eric Tilton , Jason Flinn , Kevin R. Walker, Agile application-aware adaptation for mobility, Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, p.276-287, October 05-08, 1997, Saint Malo, France
|
| |
18
|
J. Pouwelse, K. Langendoen, H. Spis. Dynamic Voltage Scaling on a Low-power Microprocessor. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mobile Multimedia Systems & Applications MMSA'2000, Nov 2000
|
 |
19
|
|
CITED BY 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Klues , Vlado Handziski , Chenyang Lu , Adam Wolisz , David Culler , David Gay , Philip Levis, Integrating concurrency control and energy management in device drivers, ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, v.41 n.6, December 2007
|
|
|
|
|