ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Bounds on information exchange for Byzantine Agreement
Full text PdfPdf (570 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing archive
Proceedings of the first ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing table of contents
Ottawa, Canada
Pages: 132 - 140  
Year of Publication: 1982
ISBN:0-89791-081-8
Authors
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800220.806690
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Byzantine Agreement has become increasingly important in establishing distributed properties when there may exist errors in the systems. Recent polynomial algorithms for reaching Byzantine Agreement provide us with feasible solutions for obtaining coordination and synchronization in distributed systems. In this paper we study the amount of information exchange necessary to ensure Byzantine Agreement. This is measured by the number of messages and the number of signatures appended to messages (in case of authenticated algorithms) the participating processors need to send, in the worse case, in order to reach Byzantine Agreement. The lower bound for the number of signatures in the authenticated case is &Ohgr;(nt), where n is the number of participating processors and t is the upper bound on the number of faults. If n is large compared to t, it matches the upper bounds from previously known algorithms. The lower bound for the number of messages is &Ohgr;(n+t2). We present an algorithm that achieves this bound and for which the number of phases does not exceed the minimum t+1 by more than a constant factor.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
W. Diffie and M. Hellman, "New direction in cryptography", IEEE Trans. on Inform. IT-22, 6(1976), 644-654.
2
 
3
D. Dolev, "The Byzantine Generals Strike Again", Journal of Algorithms, vol. 3, no. 1, 1982.
 
4
D. Dolev, "Unanimity in an Unknown and Unreliable Environment", 22nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 159-168, 1981.
 
5
D. Dolev, M. Fischer, R. Fowler, N. Lynch, and R. Strong, "Efficient Byzantine Agreement Without Authentication", IBM Research Report RJ3428 (1982).
6
 
7
D. Dolev and H. R. Strong, "Authenticated Algorithms for Byzantine Agreement", IBM Research Report RJ3416 (1982).
 
8
D. Dolev and H. R. Strong, "Distributed Commit with Bounded Waiting", Proceedings, Second Symposium on Reliability in Distributed Software and Database Systems, Pittsburgh, July 1982.
 
9
D. Dolev and H. R. Strong, "Requirements for Agreement in a Distributed System", Proceedings, the Second International Symposium on Distributed Data Bases, Berlin, Sep. 1982.
 
10
M. Fischer, R. Fowler, and N. Lynch, "A Simple and Efficient Byzantine Generals Algorithm", Proceedings, Second Symposium on Reliability in Distributed Software and Database Systems, Pittsburgh, July 1982.
 
11
M. Fischer, and L. Lamport, private communication of paper in preparation, April, 1982.
12
13
 
14
N. Lynch, and M. Fischer, "A Lower Bound for the Time to Assure Interactive Consistency", Information Processing Letters, to appear.
15
16


Collaborative Colleagues:
Danny Dolev: colleagues
Ruediger Reischuk: colleagues