ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On Euclid's algorithm and the computation of polynomial greatest common divisors
Full text PdfPdf (1.49 MB)
Source Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation archive
Proceedings of the second ACM symposium on Symbolic and algebraic manipulation table of contents
Los Angeles, California, United States
Pages: 195 - 211  
Year of Publication: 1971
Author
Sponsors
SIGNUM: ACM Special Interest Group on Numerical Mathematics
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIAM : Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
SIGSAM: ACM Special Interest Group on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800204.806288
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper examines the computation of polynomial greatest common divisors by various generalizations of Euclid's algorithm. The phenomenon of coefficient growth is described, and the history of successful efforts first to control it and then to eliminate it is related. The recently developed modular algorithm is presented in careful detail, with special attention to the case of multivariate polynomials. The computing times for the subresultant PRS algorithm, which is essentially the best of its kind, and for the modular algorithm are analyzed, and it is shown that the modular algorithm is markedly superior. In fact, the modular algorithm can obtain a GCD in less time than is required to verify it by classical division.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
J. E. Sammet et al., Symbol Manipulation, Comm. ACM 9, 547-643 (August 66).
 
3
A. S. Householder, Bigradients and the Problem of Routh and Hurwitz, SIAM Review 10, 56-66 (January 1968).
 
4
A. S. Householder and G. W. Stewart, III, Bigradients, Hankel Determinants, and the Pads Table, pp. 131-150 of Constructive Aspects of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, edited by B. Dejon and P. Henrici, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1969.
 
5
J.V. Uspensky, Theory of Equations, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1948.
6
 
7
W. S. Brown and J. F. Traub, On Euclid's Algorithm and the Theory of Subresultants, in preparation.
 
8
G. E. Collins, The Calculation of Multivariate Polynomial Resultants, to be published.