ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Evaluation and performance of computers: application benchmarks: the key to meaningful computer evaluations
Full text PdfPdf (620 KB)
Source ACM Annual Conference/Annual Meeting archive
Proceedings of the 1965 20th national conference table of contents
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Pages: 27 - 37  
Year of Publication: 1965
Authors
Chairmen
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 11,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800197.806031
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION in any evaluation of a computer should be, “How long will it take this system to process my workload?” If the system cannot do the workload, there is no point in asking how much it costs or any other facts about the system. With this thought in mind, it then becomes apparent why the technique used to determine the answer to this “how long” question becomes the most important item in any computer evaluation. Time does not permit a detailed discussion of both: why application benchmarks are the best of the timing techniques available, and of the method for setting up application benchmarks which will be truly representative of the applications to be run. Therefore, the second topic (Setting Up Application Benchmarks) has been chosen, because I believe most who have tried other timing techniques know there must be something better. I also feel that those who have used application benchmarks have limited their thinking to sequential processing systems and should now consider the preparation of application benchmarks for systems capable of multi-processing and/or multi-programming.



Collaborative Colleagues:
E. O. Joslin: colleagues
R. F. Hitti: colleagues