ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The complexity of loop programs
Full text PdfPdf (451 KB)
Source ACM Annual Conference/Annual Meeting archive
Proceedings of the 1967 22nd national conference table of contents
Washington, D.C., United States
Pages: 465 - 469  
Year of Publication: 1967
Authors
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 32
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800196.806014
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Anyone familiar with the theory of computability will be aware that practical conclusions from the theory must be drawn with caution. If a problem can theoretically be solved by computation, this does not mean that it is practical to do so. Conversely, if a problem is formally undecidable, this does not mean that the subcases of primary interest are impervious to solution by algorithmic methods. In the next section we describe such a class of programs, called “Loop programs.” Each Loop program consists only of assignment statements and iteration (loop) statements, the latter resembling the DO statement of FORTRAN, and special cases of the FOR and THROUGH statements of ALGOL and MAD. The bound on the running time of a Loop program is determined essentially by the length of the program and the depth of nesting of its loops.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M DAVIS Computability and unsolvability McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc New York 1958
 
2
S C KLEENE Introduction to metamathematics Van Nostrand New York 1952
 
3
P AXT Iteration of primitive recursion Abstract 597-182 Notices Amer Math Soc Jan. 1963
 
4
A GRZEGORCZYK Some classes of recursive functions Rozprawy Matematyczne, Warsaw, 1953
 
5
A R MEYER and D M RITCHIE Computational Complexity and Program Structure IBM Research Report, RC-1817.
 
6
A R MEYER and D M RITCHIE Hierarchies of primitive recursive functions, in preparation
 
7
A COBHAM The intrinsic computational difficulty of functions Proc of the 1964 Cong for Logic Meth and Phil of Science North-Holland, Amsterdam 1964
 
8
R W RITCHIE Classes of predictably computable functions Trans Amer Math Soc Vol 106 Jan 1963 pp 139-173.

CITED BY  32

Collaborative Colleagues:
Albert R. Meyer: colleagues
Dennis M. Ritchie: colleagues