ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysis of constructed mathematical responses by numeric tests for equivalence
Full text PdfPdf (703 KB)
Source ACM Annual Conference/Annual Meeting archive
Proceedings of the 1969 24th national conference table of contents
Pages: 117 - 124  
Year of Publication: 1969
Author
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 5,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800195.805923
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A method is described to determine if a constructed mathematical response is equivalent to the correct answer specified by the course author. Based on a combination of random evaluation and operator analysis, the method is theoretically justified for a general class of functions. Possible breakdowns due to computer arithmetic are discussed as well as the difficulties encountered when a function fails to fall in the general class. For CAI applications where a response is considered correct if it is equivalent to the correct answer, the method offers two possible advantages: (1) Only one form of the correct answer is specified. (2) Extensive and time consuming manipulation of expressions is avoided.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bellman, R., "On Proving Theorems in Plane Geometry via Digital Computer", The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 73, pp. 1107-1109, November, 1966.
 
2
Bochner, S. and Martin, W.T., "Several Complex Variables", Princeton University Press, 1948.
 
3
Caviness, B.F., "On Canonical Forms and Simplification", Doctoral Dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University, May, 1968.
 
4
Engeli, M.E., "Achievements and Problems in Formula Manipulation", IFIP Congress 68, pp. 79-84.
 
5
Feingold, S.L. and Frye, C.H., "User's Guide to PLANIT", TM-3055/000/01, System Development Corporation, October, 1966.
 
6
Gunning, R.C. and Rossi, H. "Analytic Functions of Several Complex Variables", Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1965.
 
7
Korfhage, R., Hochgesang, G., Oldehoeft, A., Mitzell, M., "PICLS, Purdue Instructional and Computational Learning System", CSD TR 28, Purdue University, October, 1968.
 
8
Manacher, G.K., "A Content-Evaluating Mode of Computer-Aided Instruction", Interactive Systems for Experimental Applied Mathematics. pp. 286-293, Academic Press, 1968.
 
9
Martin, W.A., "Symbolic Mathematical Laboratory", Doctoral Dissertation, MAC-TR-36, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, January, 1967.
 
10
Sammet, J.E., "An Annotated Descriptor Based Bibliography on the Use of Computers for Non-Numerical Mathematics", Computing Reviews, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. B1-B31, July-August, 1966.
11


Collaborative Colleagues:
Arthur E. Oldehoeft: colleagues