|
ABSTRACT
A number of approaches have been developed to modularize parts of multiuser computer systems so that access to each part can be controlled. The devices of rings and capabilities are two examples. However, today's systems are notably incomplete and subject to defeat by determined and clever users. A point of view is presented here which allows proving that a logical design of an access control system is correct relative to a designer-specified set of criteria. Implementation questions are also discussed.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Friedman, T., "The Authorization Problem in Shared Files," IBM Systems Journal 9, 4 (1970), pp. 258-280.
|
| |
4
|
Graham, G. S., and P. J. Denning "Protection—Principles and Practice," AFIPS Conf. Proc. 40 (SJCC 1972), pp. 417-429.
|
 |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Hoffman, L. F., "The Formulary Model for Flexible Privacy and Access Controls," AFIPS Conf. Proc. 39 (FJCC 1971), pp. 587-601.
|
| |
8
|
Lampson, B. W., "Dynamic Protection Structures," AFIPS Conf. Proc. 35 (FJCC 1969), pp. 27-38.
|
| |
9
|
Lampson, B. W., "Protection," Proc. 5th Princeton Conf. on Information Sciences and Systems (March 1971), pp. 437-443.
|
| |
10
|
Schell, R. (Head of Computer Security Branch, USAF/ESD), private communication, July 1972.
|
| |
11
|
Computer Security Technology Planning Study, ESD-TR-73-51, USAF Hanscom Field, October 1972.
|
|