ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Yes! high level languages should be used to write systems software
Full text PdfPdf (292 KB)
Source ACM Annual Conference/Annual Meeting archive
Proceedings of the 1975 annual conference table of contents
Pages: 206 - 208  
Year of Publication: 1975
Author
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 12,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800181.810318
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

It has frequently been remarked that it is easier recognize “high level” languages than to define the concept. For the purposes of this debate, however, I think that we agree that a language is high level to the extent that it discourages (forbids) the specification of machine details (register numbers, absolute addresses, op codes, word-packing, etc.) as a routine part of program composition and low level to the extent that it encourages (requires) such specification. (Note that, by this definition, assembly languages occupy a position intermediate between machine languages and compiled languages.) Thus, I take the point at issue to be: “To what extent is it desirable for the system programmer to specify machine details?”