ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Variations on pushdown machines (Detailed Abstract)
Full text PdfPdf (196 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Marina del Rey, California, United States
Pages: 229 - 231  
Year of Publication: 1969
Author
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800169.805437
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A class of machines called auxiliary pushdown machines is introduced. Several types of pushdown automata, including stack automata, are characterized in terms of these machines. The computing power of each class of machines in question is characterized in terms of time bounded Turing machines, and corollaries are derived which answer some open questions in the field.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Hartmanis, P.M. Lewis II, R.E. Stearns. Classifications of Computations by Time and Memory Requirements, Proc. IFIP Congr. 65(1965), 31-35.
 
2
M.A. Harrison and O.H. Ibarra. Multitape and Multihead Pushdown Automata. To appear in Information and Control.
 
3
G. Mager. Writing Pushdown Acceptors. Report No. TM-738/047/00, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California. May, 1968.
4
 
5
A.V. Aho, J.E. Hopcroft, and J.D. Ullman. Time and Tape Complexity of Pushdown Automaton Languages. Information and Control 13, 186-206 (1968).
 
6
J.E. Hopcroft and J.D. Ullman. Nonerasing Stack Automata. J. of Computer and System Sciences, Vol. l, No. 2, 166-686 (August, 1967).
7
 
8
Alan Cobham. The Intrinsic Computational Difficulty of Functions. Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 24-30.
9