|
ABSTRACT
A class of machines called auxiliary pushdown machines is introduced. Several types of pushdown automata, including stack automata, are characterized in terms of these machines. The computing power of each class of machines in question is characterized in terms of time bounded Turing machines, and corollaries are derived which answer some open questions in the field.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
J. Hartmanis, P.M. Lewis II, R.E. Stearns. Classifications of Computations by Time and Memory Requirements, Proc. IFIP Congr. 65(1965), 31-35.
|
| |
2
|
M.A. Harrison and O.H. Ibarra. Multitape and Multihead Pushdown Automata. To appear in Information and Control.
|
| |
3
|
G. Mager. Writing Pushdown Acceptors. Report No. TM-738/047/00, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California. May, 1968.
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
A.V. Aho, J.E. Hopcroft, and J.D. Ullman. Time and Tape Complexity of Pushdown Automaton Languages. Information and Control 13, 186-206 (1968).
|
| |
6
|
J.E. Hopcroft and J.D. Ullman. Nonerasing Stack Automata. J. of Computer and System Sciences, Vol. l, No. 2, 166-686 (August, 1967).
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Alan Cobham. The Intrinsic Computational Difficulty of Functions. Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress for Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 24-30.
|
 |
9
|
|
|