ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
ALMS: Automated logic mapping system
Full text PdfPdf (952 KB)
Source Annual ACM IEEE Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 8th Design Automation Workshop table of contents
Atlantic City, New Jersey, United States
Pages: 118 - 130  
Year of Publication: 1971
Authors
R. L. Russo  IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York
P. K. Wolff, Sr.  IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SHARE : SHARE
IEEE : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 1,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800158.805066
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

ALMS is a set of design automation computer programs which accepts as input a description of a logic design, specifications of modules (e.g., chips, cards, etc.) into which the blocks of the design are to be partitioned or mapped, and some constraints that must be satisfied. It produces as output a documented assignment of the blocks to the modules satisfying the specified constraints. The system algorithms are presented, system features are discussed, program execution times are given and results are presented and compared to manual solutions for the same tasks. Three conclusions are reached. First is that computer programs make it possible to perform partitioning and mapping experiments which were not possible before. Second, for one-level partitions (e.g., logic gates on chips), highly automatic solutions obtained by the program are at least as good as manual solutions and are less costly to obtain. Third, for multi-level partitions (e.g., logic gates on chips on cards) or for mappings, the solutions obtained with the program are again at least as good as manual solutions; further-more, ALMS allows a designer to try more alternatives than he could manually, so that he can trade-off the time and cost of trying additional alternatives against the value of a better solution.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Russo, R. L., P. H. Oden and P. K. Wolff, Sr., "A Heuristic Procedure for the Partitioning and Mapping of Computer Logic Graphs" to be published in the IEEE Transactions on Computers.
2
 
3
Notz, W. A., E. Schischa, J. L. Smith and M. G. Smith, "Large Scale Integration: Benefitting the System Designer", Electronics, pp 130-141, February 20, 1967.
 
4
Levy, S. Y., R. J. Linhardt, H. S. Muller, R. D. Sidnam, "System Utilization of Large-Scale Integration", IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers, Vol. EC-16, No. 5, pp 562-566, October 1967.
 
5
Landman, B. S., R. L. Russo, "On a Pin vs. Block Relationship for Partitions of Logic Graphs", RC 3088, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York. (To be published in the IEEE Transactions on Computers.)
 
6
Khambata, A., "Introduction to Large Scale Integration", J. Wiley and Sons, 1969, p. 103.
 
7
Meade, R. M. and H. Geller, "System/360 Influence on the Design of Solid Logic Technology", Solid State Design/Circuit Design Engineering, July 1965.
 
8
Donath, W. E., "Hardware Implementation", Proc. of the 1968 Fall Joint Computer Conference.
 
9
Mennone, A. and R. L. Russo, "Experiments on Mapping of Computer Logic Graphs" to be published.
 
10
Orr, W. K., "Computer-Aided Design for Custom-Integrated System," Proc. of the 1969 Fall Joint Computer Conference.


Collaborative Colleagues:
R. L. Russo: colleagues
P. K. Wolff, Sr.: colleagues