|
ABSTRACT
The question of relative efficiencies is studied in the context of a simple model of communicating aynchronous processes. The fundamental problem is whether a simple distributed system, with arbitrary size variables, is any more powerful than a system where only binary valued variables are permitted. The answer was (surprisingly) found to be negative, with an intuitive definition of the power of systems. The development of these notions required formalization of concepts such as equivalence of models, and the reduction of systems between models. It was discovered that requiring a strong definition of equivalence which decreased time apparently results in an increase in space. The trade-offs involved are seen to be tight in one approach to the problem.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Rivest, R. and V. Pratt. The mutual exclusion problem for unreliable processes: preliminary report. Seventeenth Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (1976), pp. 1-8.
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Lipton, R., L. Snyder, and Y. Zalcstein. A comparative study of models of parallel computation. Fifteenth Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory (1974), pp. 145-155.
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
Burns, J., M. Fischer, P. Jackson, N. Lynch, and G. Peterson. Shared data requirements for implementation of mutual exclusion using a test-and-set primitive. Proceedings 1978 International Conference on Parallel Processing.
|
 |
10
|
|
|