ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Testing flow graph reducibility
Full text PdfPdf (582 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Austin, Texas, United States
Pages: 96 - 107  
Year of Publication: 1973
Author
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 144,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800125.804040
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many problems in program optimization have been solved by applying a technique called interval analysis to the flow graph of the program. A flow graph which is susceptible to this type of analysis is called reducible. This paper describes an algorithm for testing whether a flow graph is reducible. The algorithm uses depth-first search to reveal the structure of the flow graph and a good method for computing disjoint set unions to determine reducibility from the search information. When the algorithm is implemented on a random access computer, it requires O(E log* E) time to analyze a graph with E edges, where log* x &equil; min{i/logix≤1}. The time bound compares favorably with the O(E log E) bound of a previously known algorithm.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
Ullman, J. D., "Fast Algorithms for the Elimination of Common Subexpressions", 13th Annual Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory, IEEE (October, 1972), 161-176.
 
4
Kennedy, R., "A Global Flow Analysis Algorithm", International J. Computer Mathematics, Vol. 3, No. 1 (December, 1971), 5-16.
 
5
Shaeffer, M., "A Mathematical Theory of Global Program Analysis", unpublished notes, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., 1971.
 
6
7
 
8
Allen, F. E., "Program Optimization", Annual Review in Automatic Programming, Vol. 5, Pergammon Press, New York, 1969.
 
9
Hecht, M. S. and Ullman, J. D., "Flow Graph Reducibility", SIAM J. Computing, Vol. 1, No. 2 (June, 1972), 188-202.
 
10
Cocke, J. and Miller, R. E., "Some Analysis Techniques for Optimizing Computer Programs", Proc. Second International Conference on System Sciences, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1969.
 
11
Tarjan, R., "Depth-First Search and Linear Graph Algorithms", SIAM J. Computigg, Vol. 1, No. 2 (June, 1972), 146-159.
 
12
Tarjan, R., "Finding Dominators in Directed Graphs", unpublished, Cornell University, (December, 1972).
 
13
Fischer, M., "Efficiency of Equivalence Algorithms", Complexity of Computer Computations, R. E. Miller and J. W. Thatcher (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1972, 153-168.
 
14
Hopcroft, J. E. and Ullman, J. D., "Set Merging Algorithms", submitted to SIAM J. Computing.
 
15
Tarjan, R., "On the Efficiency of a Good but Not Linear Set Union Algorithm", TR 72-148, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University (November, 1972).
 
16
Cook, S. A., "Linear Time Simulation of Two-Way Pushdown Automata", Proc. IFIP Congress, 1971, TA-2, North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1972, 174-179.
 
17
Busacker, R. G. and Saaty, T. L., Finite Graphs and Networks: An Introduction with Applications, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1965.
 
18
Ullman, J. D., private communication, December, 1972.

CITED BY  10