|
ABSTRACT
Architectural advances and cost reductions in computer hardware have accelerated the demand for user support on the microprogram level. To service these demands, several approaches have been forwarded including the compilation from high level languages to microprogram object code [1,2,3]. Based upon the historical development of compilers, we can anticipate that microprogram compilers will eventually require object text optimization [4]. Microprograms operate some what differently from traditional assembly language programs. The microprogram language inherits many properties from the hardware architecture. A diversity of code formats has developed among available equipment. These properties have worked in opposition to unifying techniques for improving microprograms.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
G. R. Lloyd and A. van Dam, "Design Considerations for Microprogramming Languages", SIGMICRO NEWSLETTER, April, 1974.
|
 |
2
|
C. V. Ramamoorthy , M. Tabandeh , M. Tsuchiya, A higher level language for micro-programming, Conference record of the 6th annual workshop on Microprogramming, p.139-144, September 24-25, 1973, College Park, Maryland, United States
[doi> 10.1145/800203.806251]
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
R. L. Kleir and C. V. Ramamoorthy, "Optimization Strategies for Microprograms", IEEE Trans. Comput., July, 1971.
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
S. S. Husson, Microprogramming Principles and Practices, Prentice-Hall, 1970.
|
| |
7
|
C. V. Ramamoorthy and M. Tsuchiya, "A Study of User-Microprogrammable Computers", SJCC, 1970.
|
| |
8
|
S. R. Redfield, "A Study in Microprogrammed Processors: A Medium Sized Microprogrammed Processor", IEEE Trans. Comput., July, 1970.
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
F. E. Allen, "Program Optimization", Annual Review in Automatic Programming, Pergamon, 1969.
|
|