ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Geometric complexity
Full text PdfPdf (706 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Pages: 224 - 233  
Year of Publication: 1975
Author
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 88,   Citation Count: 32
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800116.803772
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The complexity of a number of fundamental problems in computational geometry is examined and a number of new fast algorithms are presented and analyzed. General methods for obtaining results in geometric complexity are given and upper and lower bounds are obtained for problems involving sets of points, lines, and polygons in the plane. An effort is made to recast classical theorems into a useful computational form and analogies are developed between constructibility questions in Euclidean geometry and computability questions in modern computational complexity.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Über Tschebyschefsche Annäherungsmethoden. Math. Ann. 57 (1903) pp. 509-540.
 
2
R. Duda and P. Hart. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley, 1973. p. 378.
 
3
M. Shamos. On computing the area of a plane polygon. Submitted for publication.
 
4
R. L. Graham. An efficient algorithm for determining the convex hull of a finite planar set. Info. Proc. Lett. 1(1972) pp.132-133.
 
5
The proof of this theorem was suggested by Daniel J. Hoey.
 
6
Yaglom and Boltyanskii. Convex Figures. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1961.
 
7
 
8
M. Gemignani. On Finite Subsets of the Plane and Simple Closed Polygonal Paths. Math. Mag. Jan.- Feb. 1966. pp.38-41.
 
9
The kernel algorithm is due to Stanley C. Eisenstat.
 
10
 
11
After G. Voronoi. Consult C.A.Rogers, Packing and Covering. Cambridge University Press, 1964.
 
12
M. Shamos and D. Hoey. Closest-point Problems. In preparation.
 
13
This is an application of a technique of Dobkin and Lipton, Sixth SIGACT Symposium.
 
14
This method of attack was suggested by David Dobkin.
 
15
B. Dasarathy and L. White. Some maximin and pattern classifier problems: theory and algorithms. Talk presented at the Computer Science Conference, February, 1975.
 
16
For a lucid discussion of the power of geometric construction tools, see H. Eves, A survey of geometry, Allyn and Bacon, 1972.
 
17
Lemoine, Géométrographie, 1907.
 
18
D. Hilbert. Foundations of Geometry, 1899. Edited and reprinted by Open Court, 1971.

CITED BY  32