ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the average behavior of set merging algorithms (Extended Abstract)
Full text PdfPdf (273 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 192 - 195  
Year of Publication: 1976
Author
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 18,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800113.803648
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we study the expected running time of a variety of algorithms that perform set merging. The set merging problem (for example, see AHU [1]) is concerned with using suitable data structures to represent partition of a set S &equil; { 1,2, .... ,n} so that a sequence of instructions of the form “x &Xgr; y”, meaning “Find the subset containing x; Find the subset containing y; Merge the two subsets if they are different.” may be carried out efficiently. Several alternative data structures for solving this problem are known, and their worse-case complexity fairly well understood [3], [4], [5], [8]. In contrast, the average behavior of even the most basic of these schemes remains an open problem [6]. It is the purpose of the present paper to determine the average behavior for several of the set merging algorithms commonly known.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Erdös and Rényi(1960), On the Evolution of Random Graphs, The Art of Counting by P. Erdos, 1973, M.I.T. Press.
 
3
M. Fischer(1972), Efficiency of Equivalence Algorithms, in Complexity of Computer Computations, edited by Miller and Thatcher, Plenum Press, New York 1972.
4
 
5
J. Hopcroft and J. Ullman(1973), Set Merging Algorithms, SIAM J. Computing, 2.
 
6
D. Knuth(1968), Fundamental Algorithms, Addison-Wesley, Sec. 2.3.3. Exercise 19.
 
7
A. Rényi(1959), Some Remarks on the Theory of Trees, Publications of the Math. Inst. of the Hung. Acad. of Sci. 4.
8


Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrew Chi-chih Yao: colleagues