ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Dichotomization, reachability, and the forbidden subgraph problem(Extended Abstract)
Full text PdfPdf (779 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 126 - 134  
Year of Publication: 1976
Authors
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 10,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800113.803640
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present several techniques for proving lower bounds that can be applied to problems about grammars, formal languages, program schemes, simple programming languages, and automata. These techniques include dichotomization, extensions of dichotomization to certain classes of relational problems, recursive analogues of the Post Correspondence Problem, and the reachability problem. These techniques provide many new lower bounds and provide a unified framework for viewing much of the work on the complexity of problems about grammars, languages, schemes, and automata. We show how to prove the undecidability of a problem by efficiently reducing the membership problem for Tms that always halt to it. We also introduce the forbidden subgraph problem.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
D.C. Luckham, D.M.R. Park, and M.S. Paterson, On formalized computer programs, JCSS 4 (1970), 220-249.
4
5
 
6
R.L. Constable, H.B. Hunt, III, and S. Sahni, On the computational complexity of scheme equivalence, TR 74-201, Dept. of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
 
7
H.B. Hunt, III, On the complexity of finite, pushdown, and stack automata, to appear in Math. Systems Th.
8
 
9
R.E. Miller, Some undecidability results for parallel program schemata, SIAM J. Computing 1 (1972), 119-129.
10
 
11
Z. Manna, Program schemas, in Currents in the Theory of Computing, edited by A.V. Aho, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1973, 90-142.
 
12
S.R. Kosaraju, Analysis of structured programs, JCSS 9 (1974), 232-255.
 
13
M.S. Hecht and J.D. Ullman, Flow graph reducibility, SIAM J. on Computing 1 (1972), 188-202.
 
14
 
15
T.G. Szymanski and J.H. Williams, Non-canonical extensions of bottom-up parsing techniques, to appear in SIAM J. on Computing.
 
16
K. Culik and R. Cohen, LR-regular grammars—an extension of LR(k) grammars, JCSS 7 (1973), 66-96.
 
17
 
18
 
19
J.L. Kelley, General Topology, Van Nostrand, New York, 1955.
 
20
S.J. Garland and D.C. Luckham, Program schemes, recursion schemes, and formal languages, JCSS 7 (1973), 119-160.
21


Collaborative Colleagues:
H. B. Hunt, III: colleagues
T. G. Szymanski: colleagues