ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
What makes things fun to learn? heuristics for designing instructional computer games
Full text PdfPdf (666 KB)
Source Symposium on Small Systems archive
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL symposium and the first SIGPC symposium on Small systems table of contents
Palo Alto, California, United States
Pages: 162 - 169  
Year of Publication: 1980
ISBN:0-89791-024-9
Author
Sponsors
SIGPC : SIGPC
SIGSMALL : ACM Special Interest Group on Small and Personal Computing Systems and Applications
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 59,   Downloads (12 Months): 407,   Citation Count: 25
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800088.802839
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, I will describe my intuitions about what makes computer games fun. More detailed descriptions of the experiments and the theory on which this paper is based are given by Malone (1980a, 1980b). My primary goal here is to provide a set of heuristics or guidelines for designers of instructional computer games. I have articulated and organized common sense principles to spark the creativity of instructional designers (see Banet, 1979, for an unstructured list of similar principles). To demonstrate the usefulness of these principles, I have included several applications to actual or proposed instructional games. Throughout the paper I emphasize games with educational uses, but I focus on what makes the games fun, not on what makes them educational. Though I will not emphasize the point in this paper, these same ideas can be applied to other educational environments and life situations. In a sense, the categories I will describe constitute a general taxonomy of intrinsic motivation—of what makes an activity fun or rewarding for its own sake rather than for the sake of some external reward (See Lepper and Greene, 1979). I think the essential characteristics of good computer games and other intrinsically enjoyable situations can be organized into three categories: challenge, fantasy, and curiosity.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Banet, B. Computers and early learning: A new direction for High/Scope Foundation. Calculators/Computers, 1979, 3, 17.
 
2
Berlyne, D. E. Structure and direction in thinking. New York: Wiley, 1965.
 
3
Burton, R.R. & Brown, J.S. An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1979, 11, 5-24.
 
4
Hollan, J., McCandless, T., Prince. R., Putz, S. Sharp, J., & Williams, M. Tactical memorization software. Technical Note, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, San Diego, Calif., forthcoming (1980).
 
5
Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. The hidden costs of reward. Morristown, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.
 
6
Malone, T. W. What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1980a.
 
7
Malone, T. W. What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games. Technical report, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, Calif., forthcoming, (1980b)
 
8
Moore, O. K. & Anderson, A. R. Some principles for the design of clarifying educational environments. In Goslin, D. (Ed.) Handbook of socialization theory and research, New York: Rand McNally, 1969.
 
9
Morozova, N.G. {The psychological conditions for the arousal and modification of interest in children in the process of reading popular scientific literature.} Izvestiia Akad. Pedag. Nauk, 1955, 73, 100-149. (cited and summarized by Berlyne, 1965.)
 
10
Piaget, J. The origins of intelligence in children. N.Y.: International University Press, 1952.

CITED BY  25