ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Lower bounds for VLSI
Full text PdfPdf (654 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Pages: 300 - 307  
Year of Publication: 1981
Authors
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 24
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800076.802482
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Increased use of Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) for the fabrication of digital circuits has led to increased interest in complexity results on the inherent VLSI difficulty of various problems. Lower bounds have been obtained for problems such as integer multiplication [1,2], matrix multiplication [7], sorting [8], and discrete Fourier transform [9], all within VLSI models similar to one originally developed by Thompson [8,9]. The lower bound results all pertain to a space-time trade-off measure that arises naturally within this model. In this paper, we extend the model and the class of functions for which non-trivial bounds can be proved. In Section 2, we give a more general model than has been proposed previously. In Section 3 we show how to reduce the derivation of lower bounds within the model to a problem in distributed computing In Section 4, we consider lower bounds for a number of predicates: n-input, l-output functions (as contrasted with the n-input, n-output functions which have been studied previously). In Section 5, we show that previous lower bound results (for n-input, n-output functions) also apply even when the model is extended to allow nondeterminism, randomness, and multiple arrivials. Finally, the full details of the results presented here will appear in the final version of this paper.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
R. P. Brent and H. T. Kung, "The Area-Time Complexity of Binary Multiplication," Report No. CMU-CS-79-136, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Carnegie-Mellon U., Pittsburgh, Penn. (July, 1979).
 
3
P. Erdos and J. Spencer, Probabilistic Methods in Combinatorics Academic Press, 1974.
 
4
F. C. Hennie, "On-line Turing Machine Computations," IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers EC-15 pp. 35-44 (1966).
 
5
 
6
R. J. Lipton and R. E. Tarjan, "Applications of a Planar Separator Theorem," SIAM J. of Computing August 1980, vol. 9 no. 3 pp. 615-627.
 
7
J. E. Savage, "Area-Time Tradeoffs for Matrix Multiplication and Related Problems in VLSI Models," Proc. 17th Allerton Conf. on Communication, Control, and Computing, pp. 670-676 (Oct. 10-12, 1979).
 
8
C. D. Thompson, "A Complexity Theory for VLSI," Report No. CMU-CS-, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Carnegie-Mellon U., Pittsburgh, Penn. (Sept. 16, 1979).
9
 
10
J. Vuillemin, "A Combinatorial Limit to the Computing Power of VLSI Circuits," Procs. 21st Ann. Symp. on Foundations of Comp. Sci., pp. 294-300 (Oct. 12-14. 1980).
11

CITED BY  24

Collaborative Colleagues:
Richard J. Lipton: colleagues
Robert Sedgewick: colleagues