ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Bounds on minimax edge length for complete binary trees
Full text PdfPdf (383 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Pages: 293 - 299  
Year of Publication: 1981
Authors
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 11,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800076.802481
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Information is not transferred instantaneously; there is always a propagation delay before an output is available as an input to the next computational step. Propagation delay is a function of wire length, so we study the length of edges in planar graphs. We prove matching (to within a constant factor) upper and lower bounds on minimax edge length for four planar embedding problems for complete binary trees. (The results are summarized in Table 1.) Because trees are often subcircuits of larger circuits, these results imply general performance limits due to propagation delay. The results give important information for the popular technique of pipelining.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bentley, J.L. and Kung, H.T., A Tree Machine for Searching Problems, Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing (1979), 257-266.
 
2
Brent, R.P. and Kung, H.T., On the Area of Binary Tree Layouts, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1979.
 
3
Brent, R.P. and Kung, H.T., A Regular Layout for Parallel Adders, Technical Report CMU-CS-79-131, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1979.
 
4
Gannon, D.B., On Pipelining a Mesh Connected Multiprocessor for Finite Element Problems by Nested Disection, Proceedings of the Internatiuonal Conference on Parallel Processing (1980), 197-204.
 
5
Ladner, R.E. and Fischer, M.J., Parallel Prefix Computation, 1977 International Conference on Parallel Processing (1977). Also available as Technical Report 77-02-02, University of Washington, Department of Computer Science.
 
6
 
7
Rosenberg, A.L. and Snyder, L., Bounds on the Cost of Data Encodings, Mathematical Systems Theory 12 (1978), 9-39.
 
8
Stone, H.S., Parallel Processing with the Perfect Shuffle, IEEE Transactions on Computers C-20 (1971), 153-161.
 
9
Thompson, C.D., Private Communication
 
10
Valiant, L.G., Universality Considerations in VLSI Circuits, Edinburgh University, December, 1979.

CITED BY  16

Collaborative Colleagues:
M. S. Paterson: colleagues
W. L. Ruzzo: colleagues
L. Snyder: colleagues