ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Cryptographic protocols
Full text PdfPdf (1.34 MB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
San Francisco, California, United States
Pages: 383 - 400  
Year of Publication: 1982
ISBN:0-89791-070-2
Authors
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 29
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800070.802214
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A cryptographic transformation is a mapping f from a set of cleartext messages, M, to a set of ciphertext messages. Since for m e M, f(m) should hide the contents of m from an enemy, f-1 should, in a certain technical sense, be difficult to infer from f(m) and public knowledge about f. A cryptosystem is a model of computation and communication which permits the manipulation of messages by cryptographic transformations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Blum, M. Rabin, Applications of the oblivious transfer, presented at the CRYPTO81 workshop in Santa Barbara (1981).
2
 
3
R. DeMillo, R. Lipton, A system architecture to support a verifiably secure multilevel security system, Proceedings 1980 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (April 1980) Berkeley, Ca.
 
4
W. Diffie, M. Hellman, New directions in cryptography, IEEE Trans. on Inf. Theory (1976) Vol. IT-22, 644-654.
 
5
D. Dolev, A. Yao, On the security of public key protocols, Proc. 22nd Ann. FOCS Symp. (28-30 October 1981) 350-357.
 
6
S. Even, Y. Ya-&-ccedil;obi, Relations among public key signature systems, Technion Technical Report #175 (March 1980).
 
7
M. Fischer, N. Lynch, L. Lamport, A lower bound for the time to assure intereractive consistency, 1981, to appear.
 
8
 
9
E. Leiss, A note on a signature system based on probabilistic logic, Information Processing Letters (20 October 1980) Vol. 11: #2, 110-113.
 
10
R. Lipton, On the safety of cryptosystems (1980) manuscript.
 
11
S. Matyas, Digital Signatures-&-mdash;An Over-view Computer Networks Vol 3 (1979), .pp 87-94.
 
12
R. Merkle, Protocols for public key cryptosystems Proc. IEEE 1980 Symp. on Security and Privacy (14-16 April 1980) Oakland, Ca. 122-136.
13
14
 
15
M. Rabin, Digitalized signatures, in: R.A. DeMillo, D.P. Dobkin, A.K. Jones and R.J. Lipton, Eds., {ul Foundations of Secure Computation} (Academic Press, 1978) 155-168.
 
16
17
 
18
A. Shamir, R. Rivest, L. Adleman, Mental Poker, MIT/LCS/TM-125 (29 January 1979).
 
19
C. Shannon, Communication theory of secrecy systems, Bell Syst. Tech. J. (October 1949) Vol. 28, 656-715.

CITED BY  29
Collaborative Colleagues:
Richard A. DeMillo: colleagues
Nancy A. Lynch: colleagues
Michael J. Merritt: colleagues