ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the time complexity of broadcast communication schemes (Preliminary Version)
Full text PdfPdf (661 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
San Francisco, California, United States
Pages: 354 - 364  
Year of Publication: 1982
ISBN:0-89791-070-2
Author
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800070.802211
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we investigate the power of such broadcast in solving a paradigmatic problem in distributed computing. Imagine a network in which each node machine Ni (1-&-le;i-&-le;n) keeps a Boolean value vi in local memory. The vi 's determine a set S-&-equil;{i: vi-&-equil;1}. The non-emptiness problem on n nodes is to find some i in S, or else find that S is empty. In practice, a problem of this type arises in two ways: 1. Consensus testing: Has any node voted -&-ldquo;no-&-rdquo;, where vi-&-equil;1 means node i votes -&-ldquo;no-&-rdquo;, and vi-&-equil;O means node i votes -&-ldquo;yes-&-rdquo;? 2. Establishing a distinguished node: S specifies a set of candidates, and solving non-emptiness selects one. For example, the nodes may be bidding for a Job or a resource. In section 2, we introduce an idealistic broadcast communication scheme which abstracts certain features of the CSMA technology.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agrawala, A. K., Bryant, R. M., and Agre, J., Analysis of an Ethernet-like protocol, Proceedings Computer Networking Symposium of the IEEE Computer Society and National Bureau of Standards (December 1977), 104-111.
 
2
Almes, G.T. and Lazowska, E.D., The Behavior of Ethernet-like Computer Communication Networks, Technical Report 79-05-01, University of Washington, 1979.
 
3
Carpenter, R., Sokol, J., Rosenthal, R., A Microprocessor-based Local Network Node, Proceedings CompCon Fall 78, IEEE Computer Society (1978), 104-109.
 
4
Donnelley, J.E., and Yeh, J.W., Interaction Between Protocol Levels in a Prioritized CSMA Broadcast Network, Proceedings Third Berkeley Workshop, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory (1978).
 
5
Gerhardstein, L.H., Schroeder, J.O., and Boland, L.A., The Pacific Northwest Laboratory Minicomputer Network, Proceedings Third Berkeley Workshop on Distributed Data Management and Computer Networks, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory (1978).
 
6
Digital-Intel-Xerox, The Ethernet Data Link Layer and Physical Layer Specifications Version 1.0, A collaborative effort of the three corporations., September, 1980.
 
7
Lam, S.S., A Carrier Sense Multiple Access Protocol for Local Networks, Computer Networks 4 (1980), 21-32.
8
 
9
Moura, A. and Field, J., Collision-Control Algorithms in Carrier-Sense Multiple-Access (Collision-Detection) Networks, Computer Communications 4, 1 (February 1981), 10-18.
 
10
Sherman, R.H., Gable, M.G., and McClure G., Concepts, Strategies for Local Data Network Architectures, Data Communications 7, 7 (July 1978), 39-49.
 
11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Albert G. Greenberg: colleagues