ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Experiments with a supercompiler
Full text PdfPdf (504 KB)
Source Conference on LISP and Functional Programming archive
Proceedings of the 1982 ACM symposium on LISP and functional programming table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Pages: 47 - 55  
Year of Publication: 1982
ISBN:0-89791-082-6
Authors
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 27,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800068.802134
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present and discuss some examples of the operation of the first experimental model of a supercompiler. We have chosen our examples to serve as “exhibits” which highlight most important features of the supercompiler and intimate its potential uses (this is reflected in section names). The acquaintance with REFAL is not assumed in this paper; our comments will be sufficient for a reader experienced in programming languages to understand REFAL programs (and almost to learn REFAL in the process).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
Turchin, V.F. The Language REFAL, the Theory of Compilation, and Metasystem Analysis. Courant Institute Report #20, New York, 1980.
 
4
Ershov, E.P. On the essence of translation. in: Neuhold, Editor, Formal Description of Programming Concepts, North-Holland Publ. Co. (1978) pp. 391-418.
5
 
6
Vuillemin, J. Correct and optimal implementation of recursion in a simple programming language. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 9, No. 3, Dec. 1974.
7
 
8
Friedman, D.P., and Wise, D.S., CONS should not evaluate its argument in: Michaelson and Milner Editors, Automata, Languages, and Programming, Edinburgh Univ. Press (1967), pp. 257-284.
 
9

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Valentin F. Turchin: colleagues
Robert M. Nirenberg: colleagues
Dimitri V. Turchin: colleagues