ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Some issues in protocol implementation testing
Full text PdfPdf (175 KB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM symposium on Communications architectures and protocols: tutorials & symposium table of contents
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, United States
Pages: 259 - 260  
Year of Publication: 1984
ISBN:0-89791-136-9
Also published in ...
Author
E. Cerny  Dépt d'informatique et de recherche, opérationnelle, Université de Montrél, Montréal, Qué
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 16,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800056.802087
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Communication between various makes of communication equipment and across international boundaries is becoming easier due to the continuing development of international standards on communication protocols, such as those defined by ISO for Open Systems Interworking (OSI). Although the agreement to use standard protocols by the various parties involved is the first necessary step towards OSI, it is not sufficient without assuring that the protocols be correctly implemented in the communication equipment. The assessment of the adherence of a communication protocol implementation to its specification relies on testing as its main tool. The development of the tests and their application (the architecture of the test system) have properties and constraints which make them different from those currently created for testing hardware and software systems. In the remainder of the presentation, these constraints and problems as related to the successful development of a protocol test system will be reviewed. They will be separated into those aspects which pertain more to the form of the test support system (the system architecture), and to those which influence the selection of effective test interaction sequences. This division is slightly arbitrary, for some of the issues have effect on both of the above components of the test system.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bochmann,G.v., Cerny,E., Maksud,M., Sarikaya,B., "Testing of transport protocol implementations", Proc. CIPS Conf., Ottawa, 1983, pp.123-129.
 
2
Cerny,E., Bochmann,G.v., "An experimental protocol implementation testing system", CERBO Informatique Inc., prepared under DOC/DSS Canada contract OST82-0092, 1983.
 
3
ISO TC97/SC16 N1347 (revised July 1983), "An FDT based on an extended state transition model".
 
4
Maksud,M, "Un système de tests de protocoles de communication", Mémoire de maitrise (M.Sc.), Dépt I.R.O., Univ. de Montréal, 1983.
 
5
Sarikaya,B., Bochmann,G.v., "Synchronization and specification issues in protocol testing", IEEE Trans. Comm., to appear in 1984.
 
6
Sarikaya,B., Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, in preparation, to be submitted Spring 1984.