Factors affecting the performance of distributed applications

ABSTRACT

A major reason for the rarity of distributed applications, despite the proliferation of networks, is the sensitivity of their performance to various aspects of the network environment. Contrary to much popular opinion, we demonstrate that CPU speed remains the predominant factor. With respect to network issues, we focus on two approaches to performance enhancement: (1) Improving the performance of reliable, byte-stream protocols such as TCP; (2) the use of high-level protocols that reduce the frequency and volume of communication.

REFERENCES

• 1: Andrew Bechtolsheim, The SUN workstation architecture, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 1982
• 2: Eric J. Berglund, Kenneth P. Brooks, David R. Cheriton, David R. Kaelbling, Keith A. Lantz, Timothy P. Mann, Robert J. Nagler, William I. Nowicki, Marvin M. Theimer, and Willy Zwaenepoel. V-System Reference Manual. Distributed Systems Group, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, 1983.
• 3: D.R. Boggs, J.F. Shoch, E.A. Taft, and R.M. Metcalfe. "Pup: An internetwork architecture." IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-28, 4 (April 1980), 612-624.
• 4: David R. Cheriton , Willy Zwaenepoel, The distributed V kernel and its performance for diskless workstations, Proceedings of the ninth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, p.129-140, October 10-13, 1983, Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, United States
• 5: D.D. Clark. Modularity and efficiency in protocol implementation.# RFC 817, Network Information Center, SRI International, July, 1982.
• 6: D.D. Clark. Window and acknowledgement strategy in TCP. RFC 813, Network Information Center, SRI International, July, 1982.
• 7: James H. Clark, The Geometry Engine: A VLSI Geometry System for Graphics, Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.127-133, July 26-30, 1982, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
• 8: K.A. Lantz, D.R. Cheriton, and W.I. Nowicki. Third generation graphics for distributed systems. Tech. Rept. STAN-CS-82-958, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, February, 1983. To appear in ACM Transactions on Graphics.
• 9: K.A. Lantz and W.I. Nowicki. Virtual terminal services in workstation-based distributed systems. Proc. 17th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, ACM/IEEE, January, 1984, pp. 196-205.
• 10: Robert M. Metcalfe , David R. Boggs, Ethernet: distributed packet switching for local computer networks, Communications of the ACM, v.19 n.7, p.395-404, July 1976 [doi>10.1145/360248.360253]
• 11: William M. Newman , Robert F. Sproull, Principles of interactive computer graphics (2nd ed.), McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, 1979
• 12: J.B. Postel. "Internetwork protocol approaches." IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-24, 4 (April 1980), 604-611.
• 13: J.B. Postel. Transmission Control Protocol. RFC 793, Network Information Center, SRI International, September, 1981.
• 14: J.B. Postel and J. Reynolds. TELNET Protocol Specification. RFC 854, Network Information Center, SRI International, May, 1983.
• 15: D.M. Ritchie and K. Thompson. "The UNIX timesharing system." Bell System Technical Journal 57, 6 (July/August 1978), 1905-1929.
• 16: J.H. Saltzer, D.P. Reed, and D.D. Clark. End-to-end arguments in system design. Proc. 2nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, INRIA/LRI, April, 1981, pp. 509-512.
• 17: H. Zimmermann. "The ISO reference model." IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-28, 4 (April 1980), 425-432.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.4 Distributed Systems
          Subjects: Distributed applications

Additional Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.4 Distributed Systems

          Nouns: V
  C.4 PERFORMANCE OF SYSTEMS
      Subjects: Performance attributes
  C.5 COMPUTER SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION
      C.5.0 General

General Terms:
Performance