ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Serial link protocol design: A critique of the X.25 standard, level 2
Full text PdfPdf (845 KB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM symposium on Communications architectures and protocols: tutorials & symposium table of contents
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, United States
Pages: 26 - 33  
Year of Publication: 1984
ISBN:0-89791-136-9
Also published in ...
Author
John G. Fletcher  Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800056.802056
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

There are certain technical design principles for link communication protocols which, if followed, result in a protocol that is less complex in both concept and implementation, but at the same time provides better service, than if the principles are not followed. These principles include modularization into sub-protocols, symmetry between the nodes on the link, and use of the state-exchange model of a conversation rather than the command-response model. The principles are described, the extent to which they are followed by the standard protocol X.25, level 2, is examined, and a protocol adhering to them is presented.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Sloan, L. J.: Limiting the lifetime of packets in computer networks. Fourth Conference on Local Computer Networks. Minneapolis, Minn. (1979).
 
2
Fletcher, J. G. and Watson, R. W.: Mechanism for a reliable timer-based protocol. Computer Networks 2, No. 4-5, pp. 271-290 (1978).
3
 
4
International Telegraph and Telephone Consultative Committee: Recommendation X.25. Geneva, Switzerland (1980).
 
5
Jablonski, Z.: Possible improvements for the HDLC protocol. Unpublished.
 
6
Donnan, R. A. and Kersey, J. R.: Synchronous data link protocol: a perspective. IBM System Journal 13, No. 2, pp. 140-162, (1974).
 
7
Belsnes, D.: Single-message communication. IEEE Trans. On Comm. Com-24, No. 2 (1976).
 
8
Fletcher, J. G.: A serial communication protocol. Computer Design 17, pp. 77-86 (1978).