|
ABSTRACT
Natural language would seem to have a strong effect on users' behavior with artificial command languages for interacting with computer systems. We can divide the potential effects of natural language on command languages into: (a) effects on the names of commands, (b) effects on command arguments, and (c) effects on how command-argument units are interrelated (see Black and Sebrechts [2]). Others have investigated arguments (Barnard et al. [1]) and command-argument interrelations (Carroll [4]). In this paper, we describe our research concerning the first of these—namely, how the names of commands effect the learnability and memorability of the commands. Our investigation uses text-editing as the specific domain. Applied research in human-computer interaction is a subtle affair, with many pitfalls awaiting the unwary researcher. Thus, in addition to presenting research results, we will conclude this paper with some methodological lessons.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Barnard, P. J., Hammond, N. V., Morton, J., Long, J. B., and Clark, I. A. Consistency and compatibility in human-computer dialogue. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1981, 15, 87-134.
|
| |
2
|
Black, J. B., and Sebrechts, M. M. Facilitating human-computer communication. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1981, 2, 146-177.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Carroll, J. M. Learning, using, and designing command paradigms. IBM Research Report RC 8141, 1980.
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Kucera, H., and Francis, W. N. Computational Analysis of Present Day American English. Providence, R.I.: Brown University Press, 1967.
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
|