ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Questionnaires as a software evaluation tool
Full text PdfPdf (502 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems table of contents
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Pages: 83 - 87  
Year of Publication: 1983
ISBN:0-89791-121-0
Authors
Robert W. Root  UCSD HMI project, Institute for Cognitive Science, C-015, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
Steve Draper  UCSD HMI project, Institute for Cognitive Science, C-015, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Human Factors Soc : Human Factors Society
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 112,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800045.801586
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper reports on a study investigating the strengths and weaknesses of questionnaires as software evaluation tools. Two major influences on the usefulness of questionnaire-based evaluation responses are examined: the administration of the questionnaire, and the background and experience of the respondent. Two questionnaires were administered to a large number of students in an introductory programming class. The questionnaires were also given to a group of more experienced users (including course proctors). Respondents were asked to evaluate the text editor used in the class along a number of dimensions; evaluation responses were solicited using a number of different question types. Another group of students received the questionnaire individually, with part of it presented on the computer; a third group also evaluated an enhanced version of the editor in followup sessions.


CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Robert W. Root: colleagues
Steve Draper: colleagues