ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Computer response time and user performance.
Full text PdfPdf (311 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems table of contents
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Pages: 58 - 62  
Year of Publication: 1983
ISBN:0-89791-121-0
Author
T. W. Butler  Bell Telephone Laboratories, Piscataway, New Jersey
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Human Factors Soc : Human Factors Society
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 69,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800045.801581
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Nearly everyone agrees that computer response time is very important to the users of interactive systems. Many papers have been written describing the bad effects of computer response times that are too long or too short, and many sets of “guidelines” for appropriate human-engineered computer response times in human-machine systems have been published, as well. Nearly all these sets of guidelines are direct descendants of the set published by Robert Miller (1968) about 15 years ago. When Miller wrote his guidelines, he was quite open in describing them as based only on his experience, and he called for experimental data that would allow for the formulation of better, empirically-based rules for setting computer response time for optimal human performance. About fifteen years later, these studies are still missing, for the most part. Aside for the problem-solving studies of Grossberg, et al. (1976), Goodman and Spence (1981), Bergrnan, et al. (1981), and others, the literature is sadly lacking in empirical data to support the simplest assertions about how computer response time affects computer users. Though there is only the sparsest data to support them, several assertions about computer response time and user performance have become accepted as common knowledge.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bergman, H., Brinkman, A., and Koelega, H. S. (1981) System response time and problem solving behavior. Proc.Hum.Fac.Soc.25th Annual Meeting, pp. 749-753.
 
2
Boies, S. J. (1974) User behavior on an interactive computer system. IBM Sys. J., 13: 2-18.
 
3
Butler, K. A., Felfoldy, G. L., Simms, S. E., and Swenson, J. S. (1980) personal communication.
 
4
Goodman, T. J. and Spence, R. (1981) The effect of computer system response time variability on interactive graphical problem solving. IEEE Trans Sys, Man, and Cybernet., SMC-11: 207-216.
 
5
Grossberg, M., Wiesen, R. A., and Yntema, D. B. (1976) An experiment on problem solving with delayed computer responses. IEEE Trans Man and Cybernet., March: 219-222.
 
6
Hirata, K. and Bryden, M. P. (1971) Tables of letter sequences varying in order of approximation to English. Psychon. Sci., 25: 322-324.
 
7
Miller, R. (1968) Response time in man-computer conversational transactions. AFIPS Conf Proc, 33: 267-277.

CITED BY  8