E-notes: using electronic lecture notes to support active learning in computer science

ABSTRACT

Writing comprehensive, focused notes during a lecture can be a challenging task for students. They often spend most of the time actually writing notes with little time to reflect on the material presented in the lecture, or indeed to ask questions. Electronic lecture notes are a clear and concise electronic form of lecture notes provided openly to students. I use e-notes to complement the material presented in my lectures and experience has shown that they offer a distinct learning advantage over traditional forms of note taking. As students do not have to spend time writing copious notes, they are generally more attentive during class, being able to concentrate on understanding the material. This allows them to become actively engaged in the lecture, participating in class discussions and asking pertinent questions.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bligh, D. 1998. What's the use of lectures?. Intellect, Exeter, England.
• 2: Bligh, D. 1971. What's the Use of Lectures?. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.
• 3: Boyle, J.R. 2001. Helping students to become better note-takers through better lectures. LDOnline: Teaching Strategies and Techniques, http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/teaching_techniques/notetaking_lectures.html.
• 4: Davies, B. 1976. Physics lectures and student notes. Physics Education. 11, 33--36.
• 5: De Winstanley, P.A., Bjork, P.A. 2002. Successful lecturing: Presenting information in ways that engage effective processing. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 89, 19--31.
• 6: Hartley, J., Cameron, A. 1967. Some observations on the efficiency of lecturing. Educational Review. 20, 30--37.
• 7: Hartley, J. 1976. Lecture handouts and student notetaking. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology. 13, 58--64.
• 8: Howe, M. J. 1970. Notetaking strategy, review and long-term retention of verbal information. Journal of Educational Research. 63, 285.
• 9: Johnstone, A. H., Su, W. Y. 1994. Lectures- a learning experience?. Education in Chemistry. 31, 75--76, 79.
• 10: Kiewra, K.A. 1985. Providing the instructor's notes: An effective addition to student notetaking. Educational Psychologist, 20, 33--39.
• 11: Kiewra, K.A. 1985. Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alterative. Educational Psychologist. 20, 23--32.
• 12: Kiewra, K.A., Dubois, N.F., Christian, D., Mcshane, A. 1988. Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology. 80, 595--597.
• 13: Locke, E. A. 1977. An empirical study of lecture notetaking among college students. The Journal of Educational Research. 77, 93--99.
• 14: Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G., and Beaty, E. 1993. Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research. 19, 277--330.
• 15: Miller, G. A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review. 63, 81--97.
• 16: Smith, M.R., Miller, C.J., Jeans, S.L., Purdy, R., Rollke, A. 2001. Customizing powerpoint presentations for educators. submitted to IEEE Transactions on Education.
• 17: Taylor, S.M. 1997. Cooperative Learning in Distance Education. Indiana Higher Education Telecommunication System, http://www.ihets.org/learntech/distance_ed/fdpapers/1997/taylor.html.
• 18: Thomas, J. 1972. The variation of memory with time for information appearing during a lecture. Studies in Adult Education, 4, 57--62.
• 19: Weaver, Rl., Cotrell, H.W., Michel, T.A. 1985. Imaging: A technique for effective lecturing. Journal of Mental Imagery. 9, 91--108.
• 20: Wirth, M.A., 2001. Introduction to Programming in C. E-Notes. http://www.uoguelph.ca/~mwirth