| Dynamic memory instruction bypassing |
| Full text |
Pdf
(216 KB)
|
| Source
|
International Conference on Supercomputing
archive
Proceedings of the 17th annual international conference on Supercomputing
table of contents
San Francisco, CA, USA
SESSION: Speculative execution
table of contents
Pages: 316 - 325
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-733-8
|
|
Authors
|
|
Daniel Ortega
|
Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain
|
|
Eduard Ayguadé
|
Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain
|
|
Mateo Valero
|
Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2, Downloads (12 Months): 23, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Reducing the latency of load instructions is among the most crucial aspects to achieve performance for current and future microarchitectures. Deep pipelining makes L1 caches appear farther than 1 cycle, thus impacting load-to-use latency, even if these instructions hit in cache. In this paper we present a novel dynamic mechanism aimed at overcoming load-to-use latency. Our mechanism dynamically detects relations between address producing instructions. and the loads that consume these addresses and uses this information to access data before the load is even fetched from the I-Cache. We modify the renaming stage so that when these loads are fetched, they are detected and consequently squashed, since their work has already taken place. By fetching data ahead of time, our mechanism allows the microarchitecture to see further in the future, a concept akin to having a bigger reorder buffer. This mechanism is not intended to prefetch from outside the chip (main memory or L3 cache if present). Its main aim is to move data from L1 and L2 silently and ahead of time into the register file so that the load instruction can be subsequently bypassed (hence the name). This mechanisms benefits increase in the presence of memory prefetching or a good memory behaviour, since these scenarios allow for the bypassing of more loadsJ. Besides, a better use of renaming registers allows our mechanism to outperform the baseline even when the latter has more renaming registers. An average performance improvement of 24.5% is achieved in the SPECint95 benchmarks.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
M. S. Hrishikesh , Doug Burger , Norman P. Jouppi , Stephen W. Keckler , Keith I. Farkas , Premkishore Shivakumar, The optimal logic depth per pipeline stage is 6 to 8 FO4 inverter delays, Proceedings of the 29th annual international symposium on Computer architecture, p.14, May 25-29, 2002, Anchorage, Alaska
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
Michael Bekerman , Adi Yoaz , Freddy Gabbay , Stephan Jourdan , Maxim Kalaev , Ronny Ronen, Early load address resolution via register tracking, Proceedings of the 27th annual international symposium on Computer architecture, p.306-315, June 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Byung-Kwon Chung , Jinsuo Zhang , Jih-Kwon Peir , Shih-Chang Lai , Konrad Lai, Direct load: dependence-linked dataflow resolution of load address and cache coordinate, Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM/IEEE international symposium on Microarchitecture, December 01-05, 2001, Austin, Texas
|
|