Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

ABSTRACT

In this paper we study four approaches to conserving disk energy in high-performance network servers. The first approach is to leverage the extensive work on laptop disks and power disks down during periods of idleness. The second approach is to replace high-performance disks with a set of lower power disks that can achieve the same performance and reliability. The third approach is to combine high-performance and laptop disks, such that only one of these two sets of disks is powered on at a time. This approach requires the mirroring (and coherence) of all disk data on the two sets of disks. Finally, the fourth approach is to use multi-speed disks, such that each disk is slowed down for lower energy consumption during periods of light load. We demonstrate that the fourth approach is the only one that can actually provide energy savings for network servers. In fact, our results for Web and proxy servers show that the fourth approach can provide energy savings of up to 23%, in comparison to conventional servers, without any degradation in server performance.

REFERENCES

• 1: M. Arlitt and T. Jin. Workload Characterization of the 1998 World Cup Web Site. Technical Report HPL-1999-35R1, HP Laboratories, September 1999.
• 2: Martin F. Arlitt , Carey L. Williamson, Web server workload characterization: the search for invariants, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems, p.126-137, May 23-26, 1996, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
• 3: Pat Bohrer , Elmootazbellah N. Elnozahy , Tom Keller , Michael Kistler , Charles Lefurgy , Chandler McDowell , Ram Rajamony, The case for power management in web servers, Power aware computing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2002
• 4: Enrique V. Carrera , Ricardo Bianchini, Efficiency vs. portability in cluster-based network servers, Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Principles and practices of parallel programming, p.113-122, June 2001, Snowbird, Utah, United States
• 5: E. V. Carrera and R. Bianchini. Improving Disk Throughput in Data-Intensive Servers. Technical Report DCS-TR-500, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, September 2002, Revised May 2003.
• 6: Jeffrey S. Chase , Darrell C. Anderson , Prachi N. Thakar , Amin M. Vahdat , Ronald P. Doyle, Managing energy and server resources in hosting centers, Proceedings of the eighteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles, October 21-24, 2001, Banff, Alberta, Canada
• 7: Dennis Colarelli , Dirk Grunwald, Massive arrays of idle disks for storage archives, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing, p.1-11, November 16, 2002, Baltimore, Maryland
• 8: Fred Douglis and P. Krishnan. Adaptive Disk Spin-Down Policies for Mobile Computers. Computing Systems, 8(4):381--413, 1995.
• 9: E. N. Elnozahy, M. Kistler, and R. Rajamony. Energy-Efficient Server Clusters. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Power-Aware Computing Systems, February 2002.
• 10: M. Elnozahy, M. Kistler, and R. Rajamony. Energy Conservation Policies for Web Servers. In Proceedings of the 4th USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, March 2003.
• 11: Sudhanva Gurumurthi , Anand Sivasubramaniam , Mahmut Kandemir , Hubertus Franke, DRPM: dynamic speed control for power management in server class disks, Proceedings of the 30th annual international symposium on Computer architecture, June 09-11, 2003, San Diego, California
• 12: S. Gurumurthi, A. Sivasubramaniam, M. Kandemir, H. Franke, N. Vijaykrishnan, and M. J. Irwin. Interplay of Energy and Performance for Disk Arrays Running Transaction Processing Workloads. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software, March 2003.
• 13: T. Halfhill. Transmeta Breaks the x86 Low-Power Barrier. In Microprocessor Report, February 2000.
• 14: T. Heath, E. Pinheiro, and R. Bianchini. Application-Supported Device Management for Energy and Performance. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Power-Aware Computer Systems, February 2002.
• 15: Taliver Heath , Eduardo Pinheiro , Jerry Hom , Ulrich Kremer , Ricardo Bianchini, Application Transformations for Energy and Performance-Aware Device Management, Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, p.121-130, September 22-25, 2002
• 16: David P. Helmbold , Darrell D. E. Long , Bruce Sherrod, A dynamic disk spin-down technique for mobile computing, Proceedings of the 2nd annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, p.130-142, November 1996, Rye, New York, United States [doi>10.1145/236387.236423]
• 17: IBM. IBM Ultrastar 36Z15 Hard Disk Drive, July 2001. http://www.storage.ibm.com/.
• 18: IBM. IBM Ultrastar 73LZX Hard Disk Drive, July 2001. http://www.storage.ibm.com/.
• 19: IBM. IBM Travelstar 40GNX 2.5-inch Hard Disk Drive, July 2002. http://www.storage.ibm.com/.
• 20: Arun Iyengar , Jim Challenger , Daniel Dias , Paul Dantzig, High-Performance Web Site Design Techniques, IEEE Internet Computing, v.4 n.2, p.17-26, March 2000 [doi>10.1109/4236.832942]
• 21: Kester Li, Roger Kumpf, Paul Horton, and Thomas Anderson. A Quantitative Analysis of Disk Drive Power Management in Portable Computers. In Proceedings of the 1994 Winter USENIX Conference, pages 279--291, 1994.
• 22: Yung-Hsiang Lu , Eui-Young Chung , Tajana Šimunić , Luca Benini , Giovanni De Micheli, Quantitative comparison of power management algorithms, Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe, p.20-26, March 27-30, 2000, Paris, France [doi>10.1145/343647.343688]
• 23: Yung-Hsiang Lu , Tajana Šimunić , Giovanni De Micheli, Software controlled power management, Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Hardware/software codesign, p.157-161, March 1999, Rome, Italy [doi>10.1145/301177.301518]
• 24: J. Mitchell-Jackson. Energy Needs in an Internet Economy: A Closer Look at Data Centers. Master of Science Thesis from the Energy and Resources Group, University of California at Berkeley. July, 2001.
• 25: C. M. Olsen and L. A. Morrow. Multi-Processor Computer System Having Low Power Consumption. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Power Aware Computing Systems, pages 33--41, February 2002.
• 26: A. E. Papathanasiou , M. L. Scott, Increasing Disk Burstiness for Energy Efficiency, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 2002
• 27: E. Pinheiro and R. Bianchini. Energy Conservation Techniques for Disk Array-Based Servers. Technical Report DCS-TR-525, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, May 2003.
• 28: Eduardo Pinheiro , Ricardo Bianchini , Enrique V. Carrera , Taliver Heath, Dynamic cluster reconfiguration for power and performance, Compilers and operating systems for low power, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2003
• 29: E. Pinheiro, R. Bianchini, E. V. Carrera, and T. Heath. Load Balancing and Unbalancing for Power and Performance in Cluster-Based Systems. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Compilers and Operating Systems for Low Power, September 2001.
• 30: The Industry Standard. Down on the Server Farm. February 2001. http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,22095,00.html.
• 31: Mark Weiser, Brent Welch, Alan Demers, and Scott Shenker. Scheduling for Reduced CPU Energy. In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation, 1994.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.4 OPERATING SYSTEMS
      D.4.2 Storage Management

Additional Classification:
  B. Hardware
  B.4 INPUT/OUTPUT AND DATA COMMUNICATIONS
      B.4.2 Input/Output Devices

General Terms:
Experimentation, Measurement

Keywords:
disk power, energy conservation, network servers