ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Two applications of information complexity
Full text PdfPdf (250 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Session 12A table of contents
Pages: 673 - 682  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-674-9
Authors
T. S. Jayram  IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA
Ravi Kumar  IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA
D. Sivakumar  IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/780542.780640
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We show the following new lower bounds in two concrete complexity models:<ol>

  • (1) In the two-party communication complexity model, we show that the tribes function on n inputs[6] has two-sided error randomized complexity Ω(n), while its nondeterminstic complexity and co-nondeterministic complexity are both Θ(√n). This separation between randomized and nondeterministic complexity is the best possible and it settles an open problem in Kushilevitz and Nisan[17], which was also posed by Beame and Lawry[5].
  • (2) In the Boolean decision tree model, we show that the recursive majority-of-three function on 3h inputs has randomized complexity Ω((7/3)h). The deterministic complexity of this function is Θ(3h), and the nondeterministic complexity is Θ(2h). Our lower bound on the randomized complexity is a substantial improvement over any lower bound for this problem that can be obtained via the techniques of Saks and Wigderson [23], Heiman and Wigderson[14], and Heiman, Newman, and Wigderson[13]. Recursive majority is an important function for which a class of natural algorithms known as directional algorithms does not achieve the best randomized decision tree upper bound.
  • </ol.These lower bounds are obtained using generalizations of information complexity, which quantifies the minimum amount of information that will have to be revealed about the inputs by every correct algorithm in a given model of computation.


    REFERENCES

    Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

     
    1
    2
     
    3
    R. Bar-Yehuda, B. Chor, E. Kushilevitz, and A. Orlitsky. Privacy, additional information, and communication. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 39(6):1930--1943, 1993.
     
    4
    5
     
    6
    M. Ben-Or and N. Linial. Collective coin flipping. In S. Micali, editor, Randomness and Computation, pages 91--115. JAI Press, 1990.
     
    7
    M. Blum and R. Impagliazzo. General oracle and oracle classes. In Proc. 28th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 118--126, 1987.
     
    8
     
    9
     
    10
    11
     
    12
     
    13
     
    14
    R. Heiman and A. Wigderson. Randomized vs. deterministic decision tree complexity for read-once Boolean functions. Computational Complexity, 1:311--329, 1991.
    15
     
    16
    M. Karchmer and A. Wigderson. Monotone circuits for connectivity require super-logarithmic depth. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 3(2):255--265, 1990.
     
    17
     
    18
    J. Lin. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 37(1):145--151, 1991.
     
    19
     
    20
    21
    22
     
    23
    M. Saks and A. Wigderson. Probabilistic Boolean decision trees and the complexity of evaluating game trees. In Proc. 27th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 29--38, 1986.
     
    24
     
    25
    M. Snir. Lower bounds for probabilistic linear decision trees. Theoretical Computer Science, 38:69--82, 1985.
     
    26
    G. Tardos. Query complexity, or why is it difficult to separate NPA ∩ co-NPA from PA by a random oracle. Combinatorica, 9:385--392, 1990.
    27
    28


    Collaborative Colleagues:
    T. S. Jayram: colleagues
    Ravi Kumar: colleagues
    D. Sivakumar: colleagues