ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Sampling lower bounds via information theory
Full text PdfPdf (281 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Session 7A table of contents
Pages: 335 - 344  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-674-9
Author
Ziv Bar-Yossef  IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 61,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/780542.780593
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a novel technique, based on the Jensen-Shannon divergence from information theory, to prove lower bounds on the query complexity of sampling algorithms that approximate functions over arbitrary domain and range. Unlike previous methods, our technique does not use a reduction from a decision promise problem. As a result, it gives stronger bounds for functions that possess a large set of inputs, each two of which exhibit a gap in the function value.We demonstrate the technique with new query complexity lower bounds for three fundamental problems: (1) the "election problem", for which we obtain a quadratic improvement over previous bounds, (2) low rank matrix approximation, for which we prove the first lower bounds, showing that the algorithms given for this problem are almost optimal, and (3) matrix reconstruction.In addition, we introduce a new method for proving lower bounds on the expected query complexity of functions, using the Kullback-Leibler divergence. We demonstrate its use by a simple query complexity lower bound for the mean.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
P. Drineas and R. Kannan. Pass efficient algorithm for approximating large matrices. Manuscript, 2002.
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan. Matrix Computations. The Johns Hopkins University Press, third edition, 1996.
 
14
M. Gutman. Asymptotically optimal classification for multiple tests with empirically observed statistics. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 35(2):401--408, 1989.
 
15
T. Kailath. The divergence and Bhattacharyya distance measures in signal selection. IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology, COM-15(1):52--60, 1967.
 
16
S. Kullback and A. Leibler. On information and sufficiency. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 22:79--86, 1951.
 
17
J. Lin. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 37(1):145--151, 1991.
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
D. Siegmund. Sequential Analysis - Tests and Confidence Intervals. Springer-Verlag, 1985.
 
22
G. T. Toussaint. On some measures of information and their application to pattern recognition. In Proc. Conference on Measures of Information and Their Applications, pages 21--28, 1974.
 
23
J. Ziv. On classification with empirically observed statistics and universal data compression. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 34:278--286, 1988.

CITED BY  7