| The computational complexity of some julia sets |
| Full text |
Pdf
(804 KB)
|
| Source
|
Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
archive
Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Session 4A
table of contents
Pages: 177 - 185
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-674-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 44, Citation Count: 8
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Although numerous computer programs have been written to compute sets of points which claim to approximate Julia sets, no reliable high precision pictures of non-trivial Julia sets are currently known. Usually, no error estimates are added and even those algorithms which work reliably in theory, become unreliable in practice due to rounding errors and the use of fixed length floating point numbers.In this paper we prove the existence of polynomial time algorithms to approximate the Julia sets of complex functions f(z)=z2+c for |c|<1/4. We will give a strict computable error estimation w.r.t. the Hausdorff metric dH which means that the set is recursive [10]. Although these and many more Julia sets J are proven to be recursive [12] and furthermore recursive compact subsets of the Euclidean plane are known to have a computable Turing machine time complexity [10], hardly anything is known about the computational complexity of non-trivial examples. The algorithms given in this paper compute the Julia sets locally in time O(k2• M(k)) (where M(k) is a time bound for multiplication of two k-bit integers). Roughly speaking, the local time complexity is the number of Turing machine steps to decide for a single point whether it belongs to a grid Kk⊆ (2-k• Z)2 such that dH(Kk,J)≤ 2-k.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
R. L. Devaney. An introduction to chaotic dynamical systems. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 2nd edition, 1989.
|
| |
3
|
R. Engelking. General Topology, volume~6 of Sigma series in pure mathematics. Heldermann, Berlin, 1989.
|
| |
4
|
K. Falconer. Fractal Geometry. Mathematical Foundations and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York, 1990.
|
| |
5
|
H. Kamo, K. Kawamura, and I. Takeuti. Computational complexity of fractal sets. Real Analysis Exchange, 26(2):773--793, 2000/01.
|
| |
6
|
J. Milnor. Dynamics in One Complex Variable. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 2nd edition, 2000.
|
| |
7
|
H.-O. Peitgen, H. Jürgens, and D. Saupe. Fractals for the classroom, Part Two, Complex systems and Mandelbrot set. Springer, 1992.
|
| |
8
|
H.-O. Peitgen and P. H. Richter. The beauty of fractals. Images of complex dynamical systems. Springer, Berlin, 1986.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
K. Weihrauch. Computational complexity on computable metric spaces. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 49(1):3--21, 2003.
|
| |
12
|
|
|