ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Polynomial-time normalizers for permutation groups with restricted composition factors
Full text PdfPdf (221 KB)
Source International Conference on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation archive
Proceedings of the 2002 international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation table of contents
Lille, France
Pages: 176 - 183  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-484-3
Authors
Eugene M. Luks  University of Oregon, Eugene, OR
Takunari Miyazaki  Trinity College, Hartford, CT
Sponsor
SIGSAM: ACM Special Interest Group on Symbolic and Algebraic Manipulation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 13,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/780506.780529
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

For an integer constant d > 0, let Γd denote the class of finite groups all of whose nonabelian composition factors lie in Sd; in particular, Γd includes all solvable groups. Motivated by applications to graph-isomorphism testing, there has been extensive study of the complexity of computation for permutation groups in this class. In particular, set-stabilizers, group intersections, and centralizers have all been shown to be polynomial-time computable. The most notable gap in the theory has been the question of whether normalizers of subgroups can be found in polynomial time. We resolve this question in the affirmative. Among other new procedures, the algorithm requires instances of subspace-stabilizers for certain linear representations and therefore some polynomial-time computation in matrix groups.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. ASCHBACHER, On the maximal subgroups of the finite classical groups, Invent. Math. 76 (1984), 469-514.
 
2
____, Finite group theory, 2nd ed., Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math., vol. 10, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000.
 
3
L. BABAI, P. J. CAMERON, and P. P. PÁLFY, On the orders of primitive groups with restricted nonabelian composition factors, J. Algebra 79 (1982), 161-168.
 
4
L. BABAI, W. M. KANTOR, and E. M. LUKS, Computational complexity and the classification of finite simple groups, 24th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 162-171.
 
5
 
6
J. J. CANNON and C. PLAYOUST, An introduction to algebraic programming in MAGMA, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, 1996.
 
7
M. FURST, J. HOPCROFT, and E. LUKS, Polynomial-time algorithms for permutation groups, 21st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Washington, D.C., 1980, pp. 36-41.
 
8
THE GAP GROUP, GAP-Groups, Algorithms, and Programming, version 4.2, Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Aachen; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Computational Algebra, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, 2000.
 
9
 
10
D. F. HOLT, C. R. LEEDHAM-GREEN, E. A. O'BRIEN, and S. REES, Testing matrix groups for primitivity, J. Algebra 184 (1996), 795-817.
 
11
W. M. KANTOR, Sylow's theorem in polynomial time, J. Comput. System Sci. 30 (1985), 359-394.
 
12
13
 
14
C. R. LEEDHAM-GREEN, The computational matrix group project, Groups and Computation. III (W. M. Kantor and Á. Seress, eds.), Ohio State Univ. Math. Res. Inst. Publ., vol. 8, de Gruyter, Berlin, 2001, pp. 229-247.
 
15
J. S. LEON, Partitions, refinements, and permutation group computation, Groups and Computation. II (L. Finklelstein and W. M. Kantor, eds.), DIMACS Ser. Discrete Math. Theoret. Comput. Sci., vol. 28, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1997, pp. 123-158.
 
16
E. M. LUKS, Isomorphism of graphs of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time, J. Comput. System Sci. 25 (1982), 42-65.
 
17
 
18
____, Computing in solvable matrix groups, 33rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE Computer Soc. Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1992, pp. 111-120.
 
19
____, Permutation groups and polynomial-time computation, Groups and Computation (L. Finkelstein and W. M. Kantor, eds.), DIMACS Ser. Discrete Math. Theoret. Comput. Sci., vol. 11, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1993, pp. 139-175.
 
20
E. M. LUKS and T. MIYAZAKI, In preparation.
21
 
22
 
23
G. L. MILLER, Isomorphism of k-contractible graphs, a generalization of bounded valence and bounded genus, Inform. and Control 56 (1983), 1-20.
 
24
 
25
L. PYBER, Aymptotic results for permutation groups, Groups and Computation (L. Finkelstein and W. M. Kantor, eds.), DIMACS Ser. Discrete Math. Theoret. Comput. Sci., vol. 11, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1993, pp. 197-219.
 
26
 
27
 
28
L. L. SCOTT, Representations in characteristic p, The Santa Cruz Conference on Finite Groups (B. Cooperstein and G. Mason, eds.), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 37, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., pp. 319-331.
 
29
C. C. SIMS, Computational methods in the study of permutation groups, Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra (J. Leech, ed.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1970, pp. 169-183.
 
30
D. A. SUPRUNENKO, Matrix groups, "Nauka", Moscow, 1972 (Russian); English transl., Transl. Math. Monographs, vol. 45, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1976.
 
31
H. THEISSEN, Eine Methode zur Normalisatorberechnung in Permutationsgruppen mit Anwendungen in der Konstruktion primitiver Gruppen, Dissertation, Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Aachen, 1997.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Eugene M. Luks: colleagues
Takunari Miyazaki: colleagues