ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Using value queries in combinatorial auctions
Full text PdfPdf (92 KB)
Source Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
POSTER SESSION: Poster paper sessions table of contents
Pages: 226 - 227  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-679-X
Authors
Benoît Hudson  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Tuomas Sandholm  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/779928.779971
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Combinatorial auctions, where bidders can bid on bundles of items, are known to be desirable auction mechanisms for selling items that are complementary and/or substitutable. However, there are 2k --1 bundles, and each agent may need to bid on all of them to fully express its preferences. We address this by showing how them auctioneer can recommend to the agents incrementally which bundles to bid on so that they need to only place a small fraction of all possible bids. These algorithms impose a great computational burden on the auctioneer; we show how to speed them up dramatically. We also present an optimal elicitor, which is intractable but may be the basis for future algorithms. Finally, we introduce the notion of a universal revelation reducer, demonstrate a randomized one, and prove that no deterministic one exists.The full paper is available in draft form at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/ sandholm/using_value_queries.pdf.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Noam Nisan and Ilya Segal. The communication complexity of efficient allocation problems Draft. March, 2002.
5
 
6
Trey Smith, Tuomas Sandholm, and Reid Simmons. Constructing and clearing combinatorial exchanges using preference elicitation. In AAAI-02 workshop on Preferences in AI and CP: Symbolic Approaches, 2002.
7


Collaborative Colleagues:
Benoît Hudson: colleagues
Tuomas Sandholm: colleagues