ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Lightweight sensing and communication protocols for target enumeration and aggregation
Full text PdfPdf (331 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing table of contents
Annapolis, Maryland, USA
SESSION: Sensor networks table of contents
Pages: 165 - 176  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-684-6
Authors
Qing Fang  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Feng Zhao  Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), Palo Alto, CA
Leonidas Guibas  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 71,   Citation Count: 18
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/778415.778436
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The development of lightweight sensing andcommunication protocols is a key requirement for designing resource constrained sensor networks. This paper introduces a set of efficient protocols and algorithms, DAM, EBAM, and EMLAM, for constructing and maintaining sensor aggregates that collectively monitor target activity in the environment. A sensor aggregate comprises those nodes in a network that satisfy a grouping predicate for a collaborative processing task. The parameters of the predicate depend on the task and its resource requirements. Since the foremost purpose of a sensor network is to selectively gather information about the environment, the formation of appropriate sensor aggregates is crucial for optimally allocating resources to sensing and communication tasks.This paper makes minimal assumptions about node onboard processing and communication capabilities so as to allow possible implementations on resource-constrained hardware. Factors affecting protocol performance are discussed. The paper presents simulation results showing how the protocol performance varies as key network and task parameters are varied. It also provides probabilistic analyses of network behavior consistent with the simulation results. The protocols have been experimentally validated on a sensor network testbed comprising 25 Berkeley MICA sensor motes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Bonnet, J. E. Gehrke, and P. Seshadri. "Querying the Physical World." IEEE Personal Comm., 7(5):10--15, October 2000.
 
2
 
3
D. Ganesan, D. Estrin, "DIMENSIONS: Why Do We Need A New Data Handling Architecture for Sensor Networks?" First workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, October 2002.
 
4
L.J. Guibas, "Sensing, tracking, and reasoning with relations." IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, March 2002.
5
 
6
IEEE Signal Processing Magazine special issue on Collaborative Signal and Information Processing for Microsensor Networks, S. Kumar, F. Zhao, D. Shepherd (eds.), vol. 19, no. 2, March 2002.
7
8
 
9
10
11
 
12
Y. Yu, R. Govindan and D. Estrin, "Geographical and Energy Aware Routing: A Recursive Data Dissemination Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks." UCLA Computer Science Department Technical Report UCLA/CSD-TR-01-0023, May 2001.
 
13
F. Zhao, C. Bailey-Kellogg, and M. Fromherz, "Physics-Based Encapsulation in Embedded Software for Distributed Sensing and Control Applications." Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(1):40--63, Jan. 2003.
 
14
F. Zhao, J. Shin, J. Reich, "Information-Driven Dynamic Sensor Collaboration for Tracking Applications." IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, March 2002.

CITED BY  18

Collaborative Colleagues:
Qing Fang: colleagues
Feng Zhao: colleagues
Leonidas Guibas: colleagues