ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
On the capacity improvement of ad hoc wireless networks using directional antennas
Full text PdfPdf (199 KB)
Source International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing table of contents
Annapolis, Maryland, USA
SESSION: Directional antenna table of contents
Pages: 108 - 116  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-684-6
Authors
Su Yi  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, TROY, NY
Yong Pei  University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, TROY, NY
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 165,   Citation Count: 34
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/778415.778429
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The capacity of ad hoc wireless networks is constrained by the interference between concurrent transmissions from neighboring nodes. Gupta and Kumar have shown that the capacity of an ad hoc network does not scale well with the increasing number of nodes in the system when using omnidirectional antennas [6]. We investigate the capacity of ad hoc wireless networks using directional antennas. In this work, we consider arbitrary networks and random networks where nodes are assumed to be static.In arbitrary networks, due to the reduction of the interference area, the capacity gain is proven to be √2π/α when using directional transmission and omni reception. Because of the reduced probability of two neighbors pointing to each other, the capacity gain is √2π/β when omni transmission and directional reception are used. Although these two expressions look similar, the proof technique is different. By taking advantage of the above two approaches, the capacity gain is 2π/√αβ when both transmission and reception are directional.For random networks, interfering neighbors are reduced due to the decrease of interference area when directional antennas are used for transmission and/or reception. The throughput improvement factor is 2π/α, 2π/β and 4π2/αβ for directional transmission/omni reception, omni transmission/direc-tional reception, and directional transmission/directional reception, respectively.We have also analyzed hybrid beamform patterns that are a mix of omnidirectional/directional and a better model of real directional antennas.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
J. J. Carr. Directional or Omnidirectional Antenna? Http://www.dxing.com/tnotes/tnote01.pdf.
3
 
4
M. Gastpar and M. Vetterli. On the capacity of wireless networks: The relay case. In IEEE INFOCOM'02, June 2002.
 
5
M. Grossglauser and D. Tse. Mobility increases the capacity of ad hoc wireless networks. In IEEE INFOCOM'01, April 2001.
 
6
P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar. The capacity of wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, IT-46(2):388--404, March 2000.
 
7
Y. Ko, V. Shankarkumar, and N. H. Vaidya. Medium access control protocols using directional antennas in ad hoc networks. In IEEE INFOCOM'2000, March 2000.
 
8
J. D. Kraus and R. J. Marhefka. Antennas: for All Applications, 3rd Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002.
9
 
10
B. Liu, Z. Liu, and D. Towsley. On the capacity of hybrid wireless networks. In IEEE INFOCOM'03, March 2003.
 
11
A. Nasipuri, S. Ye, and R. E. Hiromoto. A mac protocol for mobile ad hoc networks using directional antennas. In Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC 2000), September 2000.
12
 
13

CITED BY  34

Collaborative Colleagues:
Su Yi: colleagues
Yong Pei: colleagues
Shivkumar Kalyanaraman: colleagues